lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200201010804.GB1352@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
Date:   Sat, 1 Feb 2020 10:08:04 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] console: Introduce ->exit() callback

On (20/01/31 13:27), Andy Shevchenko wrote:
[..]
> > 
> > I would probably push it a bit further (I posted this snippet in another
> > thread). If console is not on the list then there is nothing for us to do
> > and sysfs notify is pointless.
> 
> I didn't see post in the other thread, but I suppose that this snipped is
> for patch 4 in the series, correct?

No worries! Yes, for v4.

[..]
> > -	if (!res && console->exit)
> > +	if (console->exit)
> 
> >  		console->exit(console);
> >  
> >  	return res;
> 
> ...then something like
> 
> 		return console->exit(console);
> 
> 	return 0;
> 
> ...or...
> 
> 		res = console->exit(console);
> 
> Which one is preferable?

I don't really have preferences here, so up to you guys.

	-ss

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ