linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] mm: Add MREMAP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADyq12ysX9Ce+CUr=Cs-LcYrJDeYubDfZy2-GYFHAz111J8QBA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 1 Feb 2020 22:03:37 +0100
From:   Brian Geffon <bgeffon@...gle.com>
To:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...gle.com>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>, Jesse Barnes <jsbarnes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: Add MREMAP_DONTUNMAP to mremap().

Hi Kirill,

On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 11:46 AM Kirill A. Shutemov
<kirill@...temov.name> wrote:
> And based on the use case you probably don't really need 'fixed'
> semantics all the time. The user should be fine with moving the mapping
> *somewhere*, not neccessary to the given address

This is true and and it simplifies things a bit as for the outlined
use cases the user would not be required to mmap the destination
before hand. Part of the reason I chose to require MREMAP_FIXED was
because mremap need not move the mapping if it can shrink/grow in
place and it seemed a bit awkward to have "MUSTMOVE" behavior without
MAP_FIXED. I'll make this change to drop the requirement on
MREMAP_FIXED in my next patch.

> BTW, name of the flag is confusing. My initial reaction was that it is
> variant of MREMAP_FIXED that does't anything at the target address.
> Like MAP_FIXED vs. MAP_FIXED_NOREPLACE.
>
> Any better options for the flag name? (I have none)

I see your point. Perhaps MREMAP_MOVEPAGES or MREMAP_KEEP_SOURCE? I
struggle to come up with a single name that encapsulates this behavior
but I'll try to think of other ideas before I mail the next patch.
Given that we will drop the requirement on MREMAP_FIXED, perhaps
MOVEPAGES is the better option as it captures that the mapping WILL be
moved?

Thanks again for taking the time to look at this.

Best,
Brian