[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0572f01d-ab0a-b89e-a5d4-6ddf2d3db18e@kernel.dk>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 21:44:21 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bfq-iosched@...glegroups.com, oleksandr@...alenko.name,
patdung100@...il.com, cevich@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX 5/6] block, bfq: get a ref to a group when adding
it to a service tree
On 1/31/20 2:24 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
> BFQ schedules generic entities, which may represent either bfq_queues
> or groups of bfq_queues. When an entity is inserted into a service
> tree, a reference must be taken, to make sure that the entity does not
> disappear while still referred in the tree. Unfortunately, such a
> reference is mistakenly taken only if the entity represents a
> bfq_queue. This commit takes a reference also in case the entity
> represents a group.
>
> Tested-by: Chris Evich <cevich@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
> ---
> block/bfq-cgroup.c | 2 +-
> block/bfq-iosched.h | 1 +
> block/bfq-wf2q.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/bfq-cgroup.c b/block/bfq-cgroup.c
> index c818c64766e5..f85b25fd06f2 100644
> --- a/block/bfq-cgroup.c
> +++ b/block/bfq-cgroup.c
> @@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ static void bfqg_put(struct bfq_group *bfqg)
> kfree(bfqg);
> }
>
> -static void bfqg_and_blkg_get(struct bfq_group *bfqg)
> +void bfqg_and_blkg_get(struct bfq_group *bfqg)
> {
> /* see comments in bfq_bic_update_cgroup for why refcounting bfqg */
> bfqg_get(bfqg);
> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.h b/block/bfq-iosched.h
> index f1cb89def7f8..b9627ec7007b 100644
> --- a/block/bfq-iosched.h
> +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.h
> @@ -984,6 +984,7 @@ struct bfq_group *bfq_find_set_group(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
> struct blkcg_gq *bfqg_to_blkg(struct bfq_group *bfqg);
> struct bfq_group *bfqq_group(struct bfq_queue *bfqq);
> struct bfq_group *bfq_create_group_hierarchy(struct bfq_data *bfqd, int node);
> +void bfqg_and_blkg_get(struct bfq_group *bfqg);
> void bfqg_and_blkg_put(struct bfq_group *bfqg);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
> diff --git a/block/bfq-wf2q.c b/block/bfq-wf2q.c
> index 26776bdbdf36..ef06e0d34b5b 100644
> --- a/block/bfq-wf2q.c
> +++ b/block/bfq-wf2q.c
> @@ -533,7 +533,13 @@ static void bfq_get_entity(struct bfq_entity *entity)
> bfqq->ref++;
> bfq_log_bfqq(bfqq->bfqd, bfqq, "get_entity: %p %d",
> bfqq, bfqq->ref);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
> + } else
> + bfqg_and_blkg_get(container_of(entity, struct bfq_group,
> + entity));
> +#else
> }
> +#endif
These are really an eyesore and needs improving. Surely that can be done
in a cleaner way?
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists