[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 12:23:44 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: Benjamin GAIGNARD <benjamin.gaignard@...com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@...com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"system-dt@...ts.openampproject.org"
<system-dt@...ts.openampproject.org>,
"lkml@...ux.net" <lkml@...ux.net>,
"linux-imx@....com" <linux-imx@....com>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"fabio.estevam@....com" <fabio.estevam@....com>,
"stefano.stabellini@...inx.com" <stefano.stabellini@...inx.com>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Robin.Murphy@....com" <Robin.Murphy@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Introduce bus firewall controller framework
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 12:48:33PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Like Robin and Sudeep here, I do not understand why the kernel should
> have any business in this, let alone allowing blocks to change owners,
> that sounds contrary to the purpose of a firewall being controlled under
> an untrusted entity (Linux).
Can we rely on there being a more trusted level of software than
Linux on a system? It wasn't standard to have anything on 32 bit
Arm systems as far as I remember so you could end up with some IP
blocks intended to support TrustZone sitting idle.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists