linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/15] clk: qcom: Fix parenting for dispcc/gpucc/videocc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=X2K-Qr17qXgG1Ng8MpZQogagBqMwWu=D2OpQf+ZskBPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 3 Feb 2020 11:41:23 -0800
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>,
        Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>,
        Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Harigovindan P <harigovi@...eaurora.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Kalyan Thota <kalyan_t@...eaurora.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Kristian H. Kristensen" <hoegsberg@...omium.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/15] clk: qcom: Fix parenting for dispcc/gpucc/videocc

Hi,

On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 11:30 AM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Quoting Douglas Anderson (2020-02-03 10:31:33)
> >
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gpucc.yaml | 72 --------------
> >  ...om,dispcc.yaml => qcom,msm8998-gpucc.yaml} | 33 +++----
> >  .../bindings/clock/qcom,sc7180-dispcc.yaml    | 84 ++++++++++++++++
> >  .../bindings/clock/qcom,sc7180-gpucc.yaml     | 72 ++++++++++++++
> >  .../bindings/clock/qcom,sc7180-videocc.yaml   | 63 ++++++++++++
> >  .../bindings/clock/qcom,sdm845-dispcc.yaml    | 99 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../bindings/clock/qcom,sdm845-gpucc.yaml     | 72 ++++++++++++++
> >  ...,videocc.yaml => qcom,sdm845-videocc.yaml} | 27 ++---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi          | 47 +++++++++
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi          | 28 +++++-
>
> I don't want to take patches touching dts/qcom/. These aren't necessary
> to merge right now, correct? Or at least, they can go via arm-soc tree?

Right.  They can go later.

Specifically for sdm845 until the sdm845 patches lands the old dts
trees will yell about the missing clocks, but it's not like they will
compile fail.  Also the bindings themselves will validate fine.
There's no other way forward, though, and the old bindings caused
similar yells.

For sc7180 there's no usage of any of these clocks and this adds the
first usage, so definitely no problem there.

Once you've landed then Bjorn or Andy can pick up the dts.

-Doug