lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5ha76085my.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date:   Mon, 03 Feb 2020 08:57:41 +0100
From:   Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To:     edes <edes@....net>
Cc:     linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: Re: kernel 5.4.11: problems with usb sound cards

On Mon, 03 Feb 2020 00:28:16 +0100,
edes wrote:
> 
> 
> el 2020-02-02 a las 14:41 Johan Hovold escribió:
> 
> > I realised I forgot the test to match on the device descriptor when
> > applying the blacklist. It doesn't matter currently since I only enable
> > the quirk for your device, but if you haven't tested the patch already,
> > would you mind testing the below patch instead?
> 
> Hi, Johan, thank you for looking into this. I tested your patch, and it
> works! (5.4.11 and 5.5.0).
> 
> I haven't performed extensive tests, but the card is again recognized as
> both playback and capture device. Thank you!
> 
> Is this and acceptable solution and will this patch be integrated into the
> kernel?

I don't mind where to blacklist; we may add a similar quirk in
USB-audio driver side, too.


thanks,

Takashi

> 
> OTOH, you said:
> 
> > Ok, so the device has a broken altsetting 3 for interface 1, where
> > endpoint 0x85 is declared as an isochronous endpoint, despite being used
> > by interface 2 as an audio endpoint:
> [...]
> > Note that the broken altsetting probably should be using endpoint 0x81
> > just like the other altsettings for that interface, 
> 
> I can't say I understand exactly what you're saying, but do you think it
> could be worth contacting the company and see if they are willing to fix
> this with a new firmware?
> 
> Anyway, it's working now, thank you again.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ