[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200203201745.29986-2-aarcange@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 15:17:44 -0500
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...masters.org>,
Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>,
Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mm: use_mm: fix for arches checking mm_users to optimize TLB flushes
alpha, ia64, mips, powerpc, sh, sparc are relying on a check on
mm->mm_users to know if they can skip some remote TLB flushes for
single threaded processes.
Most callers of use_mm() tend to invoke mmget_not_zero() or
get_task_mm() before use_mm() to ensure the mm will remain alive in
between use_mm() and unuse_mm().
Some callers however don't increase mm_users and they instead rely on
serialization in __mmput() to ensure the mm will remain alive in
between use_mm() and unuse_mm(). Not increasing mm_users during
use_mm() is however unsafe for aforementioned arch TLB flushes
optimizations. So either mmget()/mmput() should be added to the
problematic callers of use_mm()/unuse_mm() or we can embed them in
use_mm()/unuse_mm() which is more robust.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
---
mm/mmu_context.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/mmu_context.c b/mm/mmu_context.c
index 3e612ae748e9..ced0e1218c0f 100644
--- a/mm/mmu_context.c
+++ b/mm/mmu_context.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ void use_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
mmgrab(mm);
tsk->active_mm = mm;
}
+ mmget(mm);
tsk->mm = mm;
switch_mm(active_mm, mm, tsk);
task_unlock(tsk);
@@ -57,6 +58,7 @@ void unuse_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
task_lock(tsk);
sync_mm_rss(mm);
tsk->mm = NULL;
+ mmput(mm);
/* active_mm is still 'mm' */
enter_lazy_tlb(mm, tsk);
task_unlock(tsk);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists