[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200203080532.GF8731@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 00:05:32 -0800
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Tetsuhiro Kohada <Kohada.Tetsuhiro@...mitsubishielectric.co.jp>
Cc: Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mori.Takahiro@...mitsubishielectric.co.jp,
motai.hirotaka@...mitsubishielectric.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: exfat: remove DOSNAMEs.
On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 01:31:17AM +0900, Tetsuhiro Kohada wrote:
> remove 'dos_name','ShortName' and related definitions.
>
> 'dos_name' and 'ShortName' are definitions before VFAT.
> These are never used in exFAT.
Why are we still seeing patches for the exfat in staging? Why are people
not working on the Samsung code base?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists