[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200203105155.zg2facrg344uyfzn@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 11:51:55 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, will@...nel.org, oleg@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, williams@...hat.com, bristot@...hat.com,
longman@...hat.com, dave@...olabs.net, jack@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 0/7] locking: Percpu-rwsem rewrite
On 2020-01-31 16:07:03 [+0100], Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is the long awaited report of the percpu-rwsem rework (sorry Juri).
>
> IIRC (I really have trouble keeping up momentum on this series) I've addressed
> all previous comments by Oleg and Davidlohr and Waiman and hope we can stick
> this in tip/locking/core for inclusion in the next merge.
>
> It has been cooked (thoroughly) in PREEMPT_RT, and not found wanting.
I did not suck it into -RT earlier since it look like work-in-progress
(based on the review). Now if you feel confident, I will suck it in.
Thank you.
> Any objections to me stuffing it in so we can all forget about it properly?
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists