[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200203111701.GA4124@willie-the-truck>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 11:17:01 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, longman@...hat.com, mingo@...hat.com,
catalin.marinas@....com, clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2] arm64/spinlock: fix a -Wunused-function warning
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 03:20:51PM -0500, Qian Cai wrote:
> The commit f5bfdc8e3947 ("locking/osq: Use optimized spinning loop for
> arm64") introduced a warning from Clang because vcpu_is_preempted() is
> compiled away,
>
> kernel/locking/osq_lock.c:25:19: warning: unused function 'node_cpu'
> [-Wunused-function]
> static inline int node_cpu(struct optimistic_spin_node *node)
> ^
> 1 warning generated.
>
> Fix it by converting vcpu_is_preempted() to a static inline function.
>
> Fixes: f5bfdc8e3947 ("locking/osq: Use optimized spinning loop for arm64")
> Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
> ---
>
> v2: convert vcpu_is_preempted() to a static inline function.
>
> arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h
> index 102404dc1e13..9083d6992603 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,10 @@
> * See:
> * https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200110100612.GC2827@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
> */
> -#define vcpu_is_preempted(cpu) false
> +#define vcpu_is_preempted vcpu_is_preempted
> +static inline bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
Cheers, I'll queue this at -rc1.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists