[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eb00f4213d90e1d1b171bbfc0dd5a3e6@natalenko.name>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 13:18:53 +0100
From: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
To: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bfq-iosched@...glegroups.com,
patdung100@...il.com, cevich@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX V2 0/7] block, bfq: series of fixes, and not only,
for some recently reported issues
On 03.02.2020 11:40, Paolo Valente wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> this the V2 of the series. The only change is the removal of ifdefs
> from around gets and puts of bfq groups. As I wrote in my previous
> cover letter, these patches are mostly fixes for the issues reported
> in [1, 2]. All patches have been publicly tested in the dev version of
> BFQ.
>
> Thanks,
> Paolo
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767539
> [2] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205447
>
> Paolo Valente (7):
> block, bfq: do not plug I/O for bfq_queues with no proc refs
> block, bfq: do not insert oom queue into position tree
> block, bfq: get extra ref to prevent a queue from being freed during
> a
> group move
> block, bfq: extend incomplete name of field on_st
> block, bfq: remove ifdefs from around gets/puts of bfq groups
> block, bfq: get a ref to a group when adding it to a service tree
> block, bfq: clarify the goal of bfq_split_bfqq()
>
> block/bfq-cgroup.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> block/bfq-iosched.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
> block/bfq-iosched.h | 4 +++-
> block/bfq-wf2q.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
> 4 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.20.1
Feel free to add:
Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
since I'm running v5.5 with this series applied for a couple of days
already without any visible smoke.
--
Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists