[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200203122514.GK8582@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 13:25:14 +0100
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, will@...nel.org, oleg@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bigeasy@...utronix.de, williams@...hat.com, bristot@...hat.com,
longman@...hat.com, dave@...olabs.net, jack@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 0/7] locking: Percpu-rwsem rewrite
Hi,
On 31/01/20 16:07, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is the long awaited report of the percpu-rwsem rework (sorry Juri).
>
> IIRC (I really have trouble keeping up momentum on this series) I've addressed
> all previous comments by Oleg and Davidlohr and Waiman and hope we can stick
> this in tip/locking/core for inclusion in the next merge.
>
> It has been cooked (thoroughly) in PREEMPT_RT, and not found wanting.
>
> Any objections to me stuffing it in so we can all forget about it properly?
FWIW, backported and tested again on downstream PREEMPT_RT kernel.
locktorture didn't find any problem and latencies look good.
Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Thanks!
Juri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists