linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 06/27] ocxl: Tally up the LPC memory on a link & allow it to be mapped

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200203123712.0000461a@Huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 3 Feb 2020 12:37:12 +0000
From:   Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To:     Alastair D'Silva <alastair@....ibm.com>
CC:     <alastair@...ilva.org>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Andrew Donnellan <ajd@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        "Vishal Verma" <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        "Keith Busch" <keith.busch@...el.com>,
        Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
        "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "Rob Herring" <robh@...nel.org>,
        Anton Blanchard <anton@...abs.org>,
        "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@...d.org>,
        Anju T Sudhakar <anju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Hari Bathini" <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Greg Kurz" <groug@...d.org>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/27] ocxl: Tally up the LPC memory on a link &
 allow it to be mapped

On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 14:46:34 +1100
Alastair D'Silva <alastair@....ibm.com> wrote:

> From: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@...ilva.org>
> 
> Tally up the LPC memory on an OpenCAPI link & allow it to be mapped
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@...ilva.org>
Hi Alastair,

A few trivial comments inline.

Jonathan

> ---
>  drivers/misc/ocxl/core.c          | 10 ++++++
>  drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c          | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 103 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/core.c b/drivers/misc/ocxl/core.c
> index b7a09b21ab36..2531c6cf19a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/core.c
> @@ -230,8 +230,18 @@ static int configure_afu(struct ocxl_afu *afu, u8 afu_idx, struct pci_dev *dev)
>  	if (rc)
>  		goto err_free_pasid;
>  
> +	if (afu->config.lpc_mem_size || afu->config.special_purpose_mem_size) {
> +		rc = ocxl_link_add_lpc_mem(afu->fn->link, afu->config.lpc_mem_offset,
> +					   afu->config.lpc_mem_size +
> +					   afu->config.special_purpose_mem_size);
> +		if (rc)
> +			goto err_free_mmio;
> +	}
> +
>  	return 0;
>  
> +err_free_mmio:
> +	unmap_mmio_areas(afu);
>  err_free_pasid:
>  	reclaim_afu_pasid(afu);
>  err_free_actag:
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c b/drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c
> index 58d111afd9f6..d8503f0dc6ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c
> @@ -84,6 +84,11 @@ struct ocxl_link {
>  	int dev;
>  	atomic_t irq_available;
>  	struct spa *spa;
> +	struct mutex lpc_mem_lock;

Always a good idea to explicitly document what a lock is intended to protect.

> +	u64 lpc_mem_sz; /* Total amount of LPC memory presented on the link */
> +	u64 lpc_mem;
> +	int lpc_consumers;
> +
>  	void *platform_data;
>  };
>  static struct list_head links_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(links_list);
> @@ -396,6 +401,8 @@ static int alloc_link(struct pci_dev *dev, int PE_mask, struct ocxl_link **out_l
>  	if (rc)
>  		goto err_spa;
>  
> +	mutex_init(&link->lpc_mem_lock);
> +
>  	/* platform specific hook */
>  	rc = pnv_ocxl_spa_setup(dev, link->spa->spa_mem, PE_mask,
>  				&link->platform_data);
> @@ -711,3 +718,56 @@ void ocxl_link_free_irq(void *link_handle, int hw_irq)
>  	atomic_inc(&link->irq_available);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ocxl_link_free_irq);
> +
> +int ocxl_link_add_lpc_mem(void *link_handle, u64 offset, u64 size)
> +{
> +	struct ocxl_link *link = (struct ocxl_link *) link_handle;
> +
> +	// Check for overflow

Stray c++ style comment.

> +	if (offset > (offset + size))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&link->lpc_mem_lock);
> +	link->lpc_mem_sz = max(link->lpc_mem_sz, offset + size);
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&link->lpc_mem_lock);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +u64 ocxl_link_lpc_map(void *link_handle, struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct ocxl_link *link = (struct ocxl_link *) link_handle;
> +	u64 lpc_mem;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&link->lpc_mem_lock);
> +	if (link->lpc_mem) {

If you don't modify this later in the series (I haven't read it all yet :),
it rather feels like it would be more compact and just as readable as
something like...

	if (!link->lpc_mem)
		link->lpc_mem = pnv_ocxl...

	if (link->lpc_mem)
		link->lpc_consumers++;
	mutex_unlock(&link->lpc_mem_lock);
		
	return link->lpc_mem;

> +		lpc_mem = link->lpc_mem;
> +
> +		link->lpc_consumers++;
> +		mutex_unlock(&link->lpc_mem_lock);
> +		return lpc_mem;
> +	}
> +
> +	link->lpc_mem = pnv_ocxl_platform_lpc_setup(pdev, link->lpc_mem_sz);
> +	if (link->lpc_mem)
> +		link->lpc_consumers++;
> +	lpc_mem = link->lpc_mem;
> +	mutex_unlock(&link->lpc_mem_lock);
> +
> +	return lpc_mem;
> +}
> +
> +void ocxl_link_lpc_release(void *link_handle, struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct ocxl_link *link = (struct ocxl_link *) link_handle;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&link->lpc_mem_lock);
> +	WARN_ON(--link->lpc_consumers < 0);
> +	if (link->lpc_consumers == 0) {
> +		pnv_ocxl_platform_lpc_release(pdev);
> +		link->lpc_mem = 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&link->lpc_mem_lock);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h b/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h
> index 97415afd79f3..20b417e00949 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h
> @@ -141,4 +141,37 @@ int ocxl_irq_offset_to_id(struct ocxl_context *ctx, u64 offset);
>  u64 ocxl_irq_id_to_offset(struct ocxl_context *ctx, int irq_id);
>  void ocxl_afu_irq_free_all(struct ocxl_context *ctx);
>  
> +/**
> + * ocxl_link_add_lpc_mem() - Increment the amount of memory required by an OpenCAPI link
> + *
> + * @link_handle: The OpenCAPI link handle
> + * @offset: The offset of the memory to add
> + * @size: The amount of memory to increment by
> + *
> + * Return 0 on success, negative on overflow
> + */
> +int ocxl_link_add_lpc_mem(void *link_handle, u64 offset, u64 size);
> +
> +/**
> + * ocxl_link_lpc_map() - Map the LPC memory for an OpenCAPI device
> + *
> + * Since LPC memory belongs to a link, the whole LPC memory available
> + * on the link bust be mapped in order to make it accessible to a device.

must

> + *
> + * @link_handle: The OpenCAPI link handle
> + * @pdev: A device that is on the link
> + */
> +u64 ocxl_link_lpc_map(void *link_handle, struct pci_dev *pdev);
> +
> +/**
> + * ocxl_link_lpc_release() - Release the LPC memory device for an OpenCAPI device
> + *
> + * Offlines LPC memory on an OpenCAPI link for a device. If this is the
> + * last device on the link to release the memory, unmap it from the link.
> + *
> + * @link_handle: The OpenCAPI link handle
> + * @pdev: A device that is on the link
> + */
> +void ocxl_link_lpc_release(void *link_handle, struct pci_dev *pdev);
> +
>  #endif /* _OCXL_INTERNAL_H_ */