[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200203143106.GF32742@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 16:31:06 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] gpiolib: fix a regression introduced by
gpio_do_set_config()
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 02:30:23PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>
> These three patches fix a regression introduced by commit d90f36851d65
> ("gpiolib: have a single place of calling set_config()"). We first need
> to revert patches that came on top of it, then apply the actual fix.
Thank you for addressing this!
It might be good to add Fixes / Depends-on to the first two, but I didn't look
if they are in any of v5.5 or older release.
> Bartosz Golaszewski (3):
> Revert "gpiolib: Remove duplicated function gpio_do_set_config()"
> Revert "gpiolib: remove set but not used variable 'config'"
> gpiolib: fix gpio_do_set_config()
>
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.23.0
>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists