[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200203155549.GL14914@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 16:55:49 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...aro.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
ionela.voinescu@....com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rui.zhang@...el.com, qperret@...gle.com,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, will@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
sudeep.holla@....com, juri.lelli@...hat.com, corbet@....net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, amit.kachhap@...il.com,
javi.merino@...nel.org, amit.kucheria@...durent.com
Subject: Re: [Patch v9 7/8] sched/fair: Enable tuning of decay period
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 07:07:57AM -0500, Thara Gopinath wrote:
> On 01/28/2020 06:56 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 1/28/20 2:36 PM, Thara Gopinath wrote:
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> >> index e35b28e..be4147b 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> >> @@ -4376,6 +4376,11 @@
> >> incurs a small amount of overhead in the scheduler
> >> but is useful for debugging and performance tuning.
> >>
> >> + sched_thermal_decay_shift=
> >> + [KNL, SMP] Set decay shift for thermal pressure signal.
> >> + Format: integer between 0 and 10
> >> + Default is 0.
> >> +
> >
> > That tells an admin [or any reader] almost nothing about this kernel parameter
> > or what it does. And nothing about what unit the value is in.
> > Does the value 0 disable this feature?
>
> Thanks for the review. 0 does not disable "thermal pressure" feature. 0
> means the default decay period for averaging PELT signals (which is
> usually 32 but configurable) will also be applied for thermal pressure
> signal. A shift will shift the default decay period.
>
> You are right. It needs more explanation here. I will fix it and send v10.
Or just send an update for this patch? I'm thinking most of this is
looking good.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists