linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 2 Feb 2020 21:12:59 -0700
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree

On 2/2/20 5:04 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> In file included from drivers/vhost/vhost.c:13:
> include/linux/eventfd.h:43:22: error: unknown type name 'eventfd_wake_count'
>    43 | DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, eventfd_wake_count);
>       |                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/eventfd.h: In function 'eventfd_signal_count':
> include/linux/eventfd.h:47:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'this_cpu_read' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>    47 |  return this_cpu_read(eventfd_wake_count);
>       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/eventfd.h:47:23: error: 'eventfd_wake_count' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'eventfd_signal_count'?
>    47 |  return this_cpu_read(eventfd_wake_count);
>       |                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                       eventfd_signal_count
> include/linux/eventfd.h:47:23: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   9a9f718763cf ("eventfd: track eventfd_signal() recursion depth")
> 
> I have used the block tree from next-20200131 for today.

Doh, missed include, didn't fail on x86-64. Fixed it up, should work
tomorrow.

-- 
Jens Axboe