linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 90/90] net: Fix skb->csum update in inet_proto_csum

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200203161927.937714547@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon,  3 Feb 2020 16:20:33 +0000
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Praveen Chaudhary <pchaudhary@...kedin.com>,
        Zhenggen Xu <zxu@...kedin.com>,
        Andy Stracner <astracner@...kedin.com>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 90/90] net: Fix skb->csum update in inet_proto_csum_replace16().

From: Praveen Chaudhary <praveen5582@...il.com>

[ Upstream commit 189c9b1e94539b11c80636bc13e9cf47529e7bba ]

skb->csum is updated incorrectly, when manipulation for
NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC\DST is done on IPV6 packet.

Fix:
There is no need to update skb->csum in inet_proto_csum_replace16(),
because update in two fields a.) IPv6 src/dst address and b.) L4 header
checksum cancels each other for skb->csum calculation. Whereas
inet_proto_csum_replace4 function needs to update skb->csum, because
update in 3 fields a.) IPv4 src/dst address, b.) IPv4 Header checksum
and c.) L4 header checksum results in same diff as L4 Header checksum
for skb->csum calculation.

[ pablo@...filter.org: a few comestic documentation edits ]
Signed-off-by: Praveen Chaudhary <pchaudhary@...kedin.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhenggen Xu <zxu@...kedin.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Stracner <astracner@...kedin.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 net/core/utils.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/utils.c b/net/core/utils.c
index 6b6e51db9f3b9..1f31a39236d52 100644
--- a/net/core/utils.c
+++ b/net/core/utils.c
@@ -438,6 +438,23 @@ void inet_proto_csum_replace4(__sum16 *sum, struct sk_buff *skb,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(inet_proto_csum_replace4);
 
+/**
+ * inet_proto_csum_replace16 - update layer 4 header checksum field
+ * @sum: Layer 4 header checksum field
+ * @skb: sk_buff for the packet
+ * @from: old IPv6 address
+ * @to: new IPv6 address
+ * @pseudohdr: True if layer 4 header checksum includes pseudoheader
+ *
+ * Update layer 4 header as per the update in IPv6 src/dst address.
+ *
+ * There is no need to update skb->csum in this function, because update in two
+ * fields a.) IPv6 src/dst address and b.) L4 header checksum cancels each other
+ * for skb->csum calculation. Whereas inet_proto_csum_replace4 function needs to
+ * update skb->csum, because update in 3 fields a.) IPv4 src/dst address,
+ * b.) IPv4 Header checksum and c.) L4 header checksum results in same diff as
+ * L4 Header checksum for skb->csum calculation.
+ */
 void inet_proto_csum_replace16(__sum16 *sum, struct sk_buff *skb,
 			       const __be32 *from, const __be32 *to,
 			       bool pseudohdr)
@@ -449,9 +466,6 @@ void inet_proto_csum_replace16(__sum16 *sum, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	if (skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) {
 		*sum = csum_fold(csum_partial(diff, sizeof(diff),
 				 ~csum_unfold(*sum)));
-		if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_COMPLETE && pseudohdr)
-			skb->csum = ~csum_partial(diff, sizeof(diff),
-						  ~skb->csum);
 	} else if (pseudohdr)
 		*sum = ~csum_fold(csum_partial(diff, sizeof(diff),
 				  csum_unfold(*sum)));
-- 
2.20.1