linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] powerpc/kprobes: Mark newly allocated probes as RO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d6451710-3582-305b-ad81-018a1ea0ef3d@c-s.fr>
Date:   Mon, 3 Feb 2020 08:00:26 +0100
From:   Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
To:     Russell Currey <ruscur@...sell.cc>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] powerpc/kprobes: Mark newly allocated probes as RO



Le 03/02/2020 à 05:50, Russell Currey a écrit :
> On Fri, 2020-01-31 at 13:34 +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> With CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX=y and CONFIG_KPROBES=y, there will be
>> one
>> W+X page at boot by default.  This can be tested with
>> CONFIG_PPC_PTDUMP=y and CONFIG_PPC_DEBUG_WX=y set, and checking the
>> kernel log during boot.
>>
>> powerpc doesn't implement its own alloc() for kprobes like other
>> architectures do, but we couldn't immediately mark RO anyway since we
>> do
>> a memcpy to the page we allocate later.  After that, nothing should
>> be
>> allowed to modify the page, and write permissions are removed well
>> before the kprobe is armed.
>>
>> The memcpy() would fail if >1 probes were allocated, so use
>> patch_instruction() instead which is safe for RO.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Russell Currey <ruscur@...sell.cc>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
>> ---
>> v2: removed the redundant flush
>> ---
>>   arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c | 8 ++++----
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
>> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
>> index 2d27ec4feee4..d3e594e6094c 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>>   #include <asm/sstep.h>
>>   #include <asm/sections.h>
>>   #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>> +#include <linux/set_memory.h>
>>   
>>   DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe *, current_kprobe) = NULL;
>>   DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe_ctlblk, kprobe_ctlblk);
>> @@ -124,13 +125,12 @@ int arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	if (!ret) {
>> -		memcpy(p->ainsn.insn, p->addr,
>> -				MAX_INSN_SIZE *
>> sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t));
>> +		patch_instruction(p->ainsn.insn, *p->addr);
>>   		p->opcode = *p->addr;
>> -		flush_icache_range((unsigned long)p->ainsn.insn,
>> -			(unsigned long)p->ainsn.insn +
>> sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t));
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	set_memory_ro((unsigned long)p->ainsn.insn, 1);
>> +
> 
> 
> Since this can be called multiple times on the same page, can avoid by
> implementing:
> 
> void *alloc_insn_page(void)
> {
> 	void *page;
> 
> 	page = vmalloc_exec(PAGE_SIZE);
> 	if (page)
> 		set_memory_ro((unsigned long)page, 1);
> 
> 	return page;
> }
> 
> Which is pretty much the same as what's in arm64.  Works for me and
> passes ftracetest, I was originally doing this but cut it because it
> broke with the memcpy, but works with patch_instruction().
> 
>>   	p->ainsn.boostable = 0;
>>   	return ret;
>>   }

Ok. I'll send out v3 as patch 1 fails on PPC64, so I'll take that in.

Christophe