linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v2 0/7] locking: Percpu-rwsem rewrite

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 3 Feb 2020 18:08:30 +0000
From:   Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     mingo@...nel.org, oleg@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
        juri.lelli@...hat.com, williams@...hat.com, bristot@...hat.com,
        longman@...hat.com, dave@...olabs.net, jack@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 0/7] locking: Percpu-rwsem rewrite

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 04:07:03PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> This is the long awaited report of the percpu-rwsem rework (sorry Juri).
> 
> IIRC (I really have trouble keeping up momentum on this series) I've addressed
> all previous comments by Oleg and Davidlohr and Waiman and hope we can stick
> this in tip/locking/core for inclusion in the next merge.
> 
> It has been cooked (thoroughly) in PREEMPT_RT, and not found wanting.
> 
> Any objections to me stuffing it in so we can all forget about it properly?

Whole series looks fine to me and it also passes my arm64 build tests, so:

Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>

Will