[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACPK8XeLWZT-VvuErtz6oE1tv1dhwwOnpZbV7PVr2PxgT2fopA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 05:54:44 +0000
From: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-aspeed <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: aspeed: tacoma: Enable eMMC controller
On Sun, 2 Feb 2020 at 16:39, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>
> Enabling emmc without enabling its controller doesn't do any good.
> Enable its controller as well to make it work.
>
> Cc: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
> Cc: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Thanks Guenter. The description in aspeed-g6.dtsi changed at some
point and Tacoma was not updated.
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-opp-tacoma.dts | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-opp-tacoma.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-opp-tacoma.dts
> index ff49ec76fa7c..47293a5e0c59 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-opp-tacoma.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-opp-tacoma.dts
> @@ -132,6 +132,10 @@
> use-ncsi;
> };
>
> +&emmc_controller {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> &emmc {
> status = "okay";
> };
This node is redundant, as it is not disabled in the dtsi.
Andrew, should we add disabled to the emmc node?
Or remove the label completely, and just have emmc_controller?
Cheers,
Joel
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists