[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1580796963.21785.1.camel@mtksdccf07>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 14:16:03 +0800
From: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
To: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
CC: <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>, <nguyenb@...eaurora.org>,
<hongwus@...eaurora.org>, <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
<saravanak@...gle.com>, <salyzyn@...gle.com>,
"Alim Akhtar" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
"Bart Van Assche" <bvanassche@....org>,
Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@...eaurora.org>,
Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/8] scsi: ufs: set load before setting voltage in
regulators
On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 01:17 -0800, Can Guo wrote:
> From: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>
>
> This sequence change is required to avoid dips in voltage
> during boot-up.
>
> Apparently, this dip is caused because in the original
> sequence, the regulators are initialized in lpm mode.
> And then when the load is set to high, and more current
> is drawn, than is allowed in lpm, the dip is seen.
>
> Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
> Reviewed-by: Hongwu Su <hongwus@...eaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists