linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] GPIO: it87: fixed a typo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMpxmJWBAx=_4=xPU9STN04tYficUrpKSu7B6qZ=Tu3-xta__w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 4 Feb 2020 10:34:17 +0100
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
To:     sachin agarwal <asachin591@...il.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] GPIO: it87: fixed a typo

pon., 3 lut 2020 o 13:56 sachin agarwal <asachin591@...il.com> napisał(a):
>
> From: sachin agarwal <asachin591@...il.com>
>
> we had written "IO" rather than "I/O".
>
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Agarwal <asachin591@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-it87.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-it87.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-it87.c
> index b497a1d18ca9..79b688e9cd2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-it87.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-it87.c
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
>   * @io_size size of the port rage starting from io_base.
>   * @output_base Super I/O register address for Output Enable register
>   * @simple_base Super I/O 'Simple I/O' Enable register
> - * @simple_size Super IO 'Simple I/O' Enable register size; this is
> + * @simple_size Super I/O 'Simple I/O' Enable register size; this is
>   *     required because IT87xx chips might only provide Simple I/O
>   *     switches on a subset of lines, whereas the others keep the
>   *     same status all time.
> --
> 2.24.1
>

Patchwork seems to be confused by this series - or maybe you just sent
another iteration without a version number? Anyway - please see other
patches on the list, adjust your subject message and send the entire
series at once using git send-email.

Bart