lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 4 Feb 2020 13:31:25 +0100
From:   Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
To:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        Manish Narani <manish.narani@...inx.com>
Cc:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, jolly.shah@...inx.com,
        rajan.vaja@...inx.com, nava.manne@...inx.com,
        tejas.patel@...inx.com,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sdhci: arasan: Remove quirk for broken base clock

On 04. 02. 20 13:29, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 12:42, Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 03. 02. 20 12:31, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>>> On 21/01/20 12:21 pm, Manish Narani wrote:
>>>> This patch removes quirk which indicates a broken base clock. This was
>>>> making the kernel report wrong base clock of ~187MHz instead of 200MHz
>>>> even as the measurement on the hardware was showing 200MHz.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Manish Narani <manish.narani@...inx.com>
>>>> State: pending
>>>
>>> Huh?
>>
>> It shouldn't be here. It is internal patch labeling.
>> Manish: Please send v2 with all lines you got and remove this above.
> 
> No need for a resend, I can fix this before applying, which will be
> when rc1 is out.
> 
>>
>>>
>>> Otherwise:
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
>>
>> These patches requires firmware changes. Feel free to take it directly
>> via your tree. If you want me to take it via arm-soc tree please let me
>> know.
> 
> Thanks, I pick them up via my mmc tree then.

ok. Please let me know if there is any conflict. It should be simple add.

Thanks,
Michal

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ