linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: convert extcon-usbc-cros-ec.txt extcon-usbc-cros-ec.yaml

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46068846-5d7d-8de6-3950-3b0a0d8b60a2@collabora.com>
Date:   Tue, 4 Feb 2020 16:38:51 +0100
From:   Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@...labora.com>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com,
        cw00.choi@...sung.com, mark.rutland@....com, bleung@...omium.org,
        groeck@...omium.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        helen.koike@...labora.com, ezequiel@...labora.com,
        kernel@...labora.com, dafna3@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: convert extcon-usbc-cros-ec.txt
 extcon-usbc-cros-ec.yaml

Hi Dafna, Rob,

On 3/2/20 13:18, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 04:13:13PM +0100, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:
>> convert the binding file extcon-usbc-cros-ec.txt to yaml format
>> This was tested and verified on ARM with:
>> make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-usbc-cros-ec.yaml
>> make dtbs_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-usbc-cros-ec.yaml
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@...labora.com>
>> ---
>>  .../bindings/extcon/extcon-usbc-cros-ec.txt   | 24 -----------
>>  .../bindings/extcon/extcon-usbc-cros-ec.yaml  | 42 +++++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-usbc-cros-ec.txt
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-usbc-cros-ec.yaml
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-usbc-cros-ec.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-usbc-cros-ec.txt
>> deleted file mode 100644
>> index 8e8625c00dfa..000000000000
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-usbc-cros-ec.txt
>> +++ /dev/null
>> @@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
>> -ChromeOS EC USB Type-C cable and accessories detection
>> -
>> -On ChromeOS systems with USB Type C ports, the ChromeOS Embedded Controller is
>> -able to detect the state of external accessories such as display adapters
>> -or USB devices when said accessories are attached or detached.
>> -
>> -The node for this device must be under a cros-ec node like google,cros-ec-spi
>> -or google,cros-ec-i2c.
>> -
>> -Required properties:
>> -- compatible:		Should be "google,extcon-usbc-cros-ec".
>> -- google,usb-port-id:	Specifies the USB port ID to use.
>> -
>> -Example:
>> -	cros-ec@0 {
>> -		compatible = "google,cros-ec-i2c";
>> -
>> -		...
>> -
>> -		extcon {
>> -			compatible = "google,extcon-usbc-cros-ec";
>> -			google,usb-port-id = <0>;
>> -		};
>> -	}
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-usbc-cros-ec.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-usbc-cros-ec.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..78779831282a
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-usbc-cros-ec.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> 
> Surely Google is the only copyright holder on the old file and would be 
> okay with dual licensing here?
> 
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/extcon/extcon-usbc-cros-ec.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title: ChromeOS EC USB Type-C cable and accessories detection
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> +  - MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
>> +  - Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
> 
> Usually this is someone that knows the h/w, not who applies the patch. 
> I'd expect a Google person.
> 

I'd say that the driver author should be the maintainer, but if you don't know
who is the maintainer because is not specified you can add Benson and me as
maintainers (as chrome-platform maintainers we take care of this and all cros-ec
related drivers)

Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>

>> +
>> +description: |
>> +  On ChromeOS systems with USB Type C ports, the ChromeOS Embedded Controller is
>> +  able to detect the state of external accessories such as display adapters
>> +  or USB devices when said accessories are attached or detached.
>> +  The node for this device must be under a cros-ec node like google,cros-ec-spi
>> +  or google,cros-ec-i2c.
>> +
>> +properties:
>> +  compatible:
>> +    const: google,extcon-usbc-cros-ec
>> +
>> +  google,usb-port-id:
>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>> +    description: |
>> +      the port id
> 
> Any range of values allowed? ~0 is okay?
> 

>From hardware point of view, the port id, is a number from 0 to 255. The typical
usage is have two ports with port id 0 and port id 1.


>> +required:
>> +  - compatible
>> +  - google,usb-port-id
>> +
>> +additionalProperties: false
>> +
>> +examples:
>> +  - |
>> +    cros-ec@0 {
>> +        compatible = "google,cros-ec-i2c";
>> +        extcon {
>> +            compatible = "google,extcon-usbc-cros-ec";
>> +            google,usb-port-id = <0>;
>> +        };
>> +    };
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
>>