linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] bootconfig: Only load bootconfig if "config=bootconfig" is on the kernel cmdline (was: bootconfig: Add "disable_bootconfig" cmdline option to disable bootconfig)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjTT81QUTAEbDPY=dJE2E18M_K2RhxSUxWmcbMyZUpm5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 4 Feb 2020 15:43:00 +0000
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] bootconfig: Only load bootconfig if
 "config=bootconfig" is on the kernel cmdline (was: bootconfig: Add
 "disable_bootconfig" cmdline option to disable bootconfig)

On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 2:33 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> I wonder if we need the "config=" part. Would "bootconfig" be
> sufficient, or is it better to keep it for documentation purposes.

I suspect "bootconfig" is sufficient, if it's easier to parse.

            Linus