[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200204162917.GA1772390@rani.riverdale.lan>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 11:29:17 -0500
From: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] initramfs: don't double-compress built-in initramfs if
the kernel is compressed
On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 11:22:19AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 6:16 AM Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu> wrote:
> >
> > If the kernel is going to be compressed anyway, there is no point in
> > double-compressing the built-in initramfs. Hide the built-in initramfs
> > compression choice in this case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
>
>
> Double-compression slightly reduces the data size.
> And, keeping the bare vmlinux small is beneficial, IMHO.
>
Ok. In my setup (kernel is compressed by xz), none for the builtin
initramfs is optimal by a measurable amount, but I that will depend on
config/initramfs contents/compression methods, so might well not be true
in general. Maybe add a note to the help text?
none 7030816 arch/x86/boot/bzImage
gz 7382144 arch/x86/boot/bzImage
bz2 7353696 arch/x86/boot/bzImage
lzma 7118176 arch/x86/boot/bzImage
xz 7126400 arch/x86/boot/bzImage
lzo 7379360 arch/x86/boot/bzImage
lz4 7335712 arch/x86/boot/bzImage
diff --git a/usr/Kconfig b/usr/Kconfig
index a6b68503d177..b68910b225fc 100644
--- a/usr/Kconfig
+++ b/usr/Kconfig
@@ -125,6 +125,12 @@ choice
low on RAM, since it reduces the memory consumption during
boot.
+ Note that if the kernel itself is compressed, the builtin initramfs
+ will be compressed twice, first by the algorithm selected here, and
+ then by the kernel compression method chosen. This may increase the
+ final image size, so you should test whether compressing the builtin
+ initramfs provides any savings.
+
Keep in mind that your build system needs to provide the appropriate
compression tool to compress the generated initram cpio file for
embedding.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists