[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPhsuW6k10vZju0r_=HG81gWkZGMQD-0e5Rk-b3tZN7yDTi+jQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 16:25:50 -0800
From: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
To: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@...ud.ionos.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
linux-raid <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] md: optimize barrier usage for Rmw atomic bitops
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 8:43 AM Guoqing Jiang
<guoqing.jiang@...ud.ionos.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/29/20 7:14 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > For both set and clear_bit, we can avoid the unnecessary barrier
> > on non LL/SC architectures, such as x86. Instead, use the
> > smp_mb__{before,after}_atomic() calls.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
./scripts/checkpatch.pl reports the following:
=============== 8< =================
WARNING: memory barrier without comment
#81: FILE: drivers/md/md.c:2564:
+ smp_mb__before_atomic();
WARNING: memory barrier without comment
#112: FILE: drivers/md/raid5.c:367:
+ smp_mb__before_atomic();
WARNING: Missing Signed-off-by: line by nominal patch author
'Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>'
total: 0 errors, 3 warnings, 42 lines checked
=============== 8< =================
Since we are on it, let's add comments for the barriers. Also, please
double check the email
is correct.
Thanks,
Song
Powered by blists - more mailing lists