[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=Ximzn+WwmDr62sjOsFOQRtQaB34BP7rY-y4x7Pb-zGPg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 09:24:55 -0800
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Sandeep Maheswaram <sanm@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] phy: qcom-qusb2: Add support for overriding tuning
parameters in QUSB2 V2 PHY
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 4:52 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Also, why not use of_property_read_u8() and make DT writers have
>
> /bits/ 8 <0xf0>
>
> properties so that we can keep things smaller. I don't understand why
> they're u32 in DT besides to make it simpler to specify a u32.
As per the other thread, I think it's discouraged to specify /bits/ 8
in DT unless it's really needed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists