linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] epoll: fix possible lost wakeup on epoll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 4 Feb 2020 14:29:04 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@...e.de>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Max Neunhoeffer <max@...ngodb.com>,
        Christopher Kohlhoff <chris.kohlhoff@...arpool.io>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>,
        Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] epoll: fix possible lost wakeup on epoll_ctl() path

On Tue, 04 Feb 2020 18:20:03 +0100, Roman Penyaev wrote:
> On 2020-02-04 17:32, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 04 Feb 2020 11:41:42 +0100, Roman Penyaev wrote:  
> >> Hi Andrew,
> >> 
> >> Could you please suggest me, do I need to include Reported-by tag,
> >> or reference to the bug is enough?  
> > 
> > Sorry to jump in but FWIW I like the Reported-and-bisected-by tag to
> > fully credit the extra work done by the reporter.  
> 
> Reported-by: Max Neunhoeffer <max@...ngodb.com>
> Bisected-by: Max Neunhoeffer <max@...ngodb.com>
> 
> Correct?

That should work, I like the brevity of the single combined

Reported-and-bisected-by: Max Neunhoeffer <max@...ngodb.com>

line but looks like some separate the two even when both point 
to the same person. 

Unfortunately Documentation/process is silent on any "bisected-by" 
use, so you'll have to exercise your own judgement :)