[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BYAPR11MB362427151E22D623A1B48E37F2030@BYAPR11MB3624.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 23:10:49 +0000
From: "Kammela, Gayatri" <gayatri.kammela@...el.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
CC: Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Somayaji, Vishwanath" <vishwanath.somayaji@...el.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
"Westerberg, Mika" <mika.westerberg@...el.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Prestopine, Charles D" <charles.d.prestopine@...el.com>,
"Pandruvada, Srinivas" <srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com>,
"Box, David E" <david.e.box@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 0/7] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Add debugfs entries
> > > > > It doesn't apply to our for-next branch.
> > > > Sorry to hear that. I've rebased the series on mainline 5.5-rc7.
> > > > Should I
> > > rebase it on for-next branch?
> > >
> > > You should always base your branch on the for-next (whatever it's
> > > being
> > > called) of the subsystem your series against of.
> >
> > Hi Andy,
> >
> > The current series has a dependency on Tiger Lake and Elkhart Lake patche
> which is merged in to mainline.
> >
> > (554f269f0f38 platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Add Intel Elkhart Lake
> > support 49a437941c3f platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Add Intel Tiger
> > Lake support
> > 6268c0b278b5 platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Make debugfs entry for
> > pch_ip_power_gating_status conditional
> > e39854781830 platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Create platform dependent
> > bitmap structs
> > b1cb33dae414 platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Clean up: Remove comma
> > after the termination line)
> >
> > But they are not available in for-next branch. I am confused, how that could
> be the case. For me to base the current series on for-next branch, the
> dependency patch series should be available in for-next branch.
>
> I'm wondering how did you check it?
> The branch location is in this [1] tree.
Thank you for your patience Andy. I apologize for the mishap as I was checking in the wrong tree. I have rebased the series on for-next branch on right tree this time and sent v2.
>
> [1]: http://git.infradead.org/linux-platform-drivers-x86.git
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists