lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0d7f7ade-3a1e-5428-d851-f1a886f58712@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Tue, 4 Feb 2020 10:22:42 +0530
From:   Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc:     swboyd@...omium.org, agross@...nel.org, david.brown@...aro.org,
        Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
        evgreen@...omium.org, dianders@...omium.org, rnayak@...eaurora.org,
        ilina@...eaurora.org, lsrao@...eaurora.org, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
        rjw@...ysocki.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] drivers: firmware: psci: Add hierarchical domain
 idle states converter


On 2/3/2020 10:38 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 07:05:38PM +0530, Maulik Shah wrote:
>> From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
>>
>> If the hierarchical CPU topology is used, but the OS initiated mode isn't
>> supported, we need to rely solely on the regular cpuidle framework to
>> manage the idle state selection, rather than using genpd and its
>> governor.
>>
>> For this reason, introduce a new PSCI DT helper function,
>> psci_dt_pm_domains_parse_states(), which parses and converts the
>> hierarchically described domain idle states from DT, into regular flattened
>> cpuidle states. The converted states are added to the existing cpuidle
>> driver's array of idle states, which make them available for cpuidle.
>>
> And what's the main motivation for this if OSI is not supported in the
> firmware ?

Hi Sudeep,

Main motivation is to do last-man activities before the CPU cluster can 
enter a deep idle state.

>> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
>> [applied to new path, resolved conflicts]
>> Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>   drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c        |  41 +++++-----
>>   drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.h        |  11 +++
>>   3 files changed, 153 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c
>> index 423f03b..3c417f7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c
>> @@ -26,13 +26,17 @@ struct psci_pd_provider {
>>   };
>>
>>   static LIST_HEAD(psci_pd_providers);
>> -static bool osi_mode_enabled __initdata;
>> +static bool osi_mode_enabled;
>>
>>   static int psci_pd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *pd)
>>   {
>>   	struct genpd_power_state *state = &pd->states[pd->state_idx];
>>   	u32 *pd_state;
>>
>> +	/* If we have failed to enable OSI mode, then abort power off. */
>> +	if ((psci_has_osi_support()) && !osi_mode_enabled)
>> +		return -EBUSY;
>> +
> Why is this needed ? IIUC we don't create genpd domains if OSI is not
> enabled.

we do create genpd domains, for cpu domains, we just abort power off 
here since idle states are converted into regular flattened mode.

however genpd poweroff will be used by parent domain (rsc in this case) 
which is kept in hireachy in DTSI with cluster domain to do last man 
activities.

>>   	if (!state->data)
>>   		return 0;
>>
>> @@ -101,6 +105,105 @@ static void psci_pd_free_states(struct genpd_power_state *states,
>>   	kfree(states);
>>   }
>>
>> +static void psci_pd_convert_states(struct cpuidle_state *idle_state,
>> +			u32 *psci_state, struct genpd_power_state *state)
>> +{
>> +	u32 *state_data = state->data;
>> +	u64 target_residency_us = state->residency_ns;
>> +	u64 exit_latency_us = state->power_on_latency_ns +
>> +			state->power_off_latency_ns;
>> +
>> +	*psci_state = *state_data;
>> +	do_div(target_residency_us, 1000);
>> +	idle_state->target_residency = target_residency_us;
>> +	do_div(exit_latency_us, 1000);
>> +	idle_state->exit_latency = exit_latency_us;
>> +	idle_state->enter = &psci_enter_domain_idle_state;
>> +	idle_state->flags |= CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP;
>> +
>> +	strncpy(idle_state->name, to_of_node(state->fwnode)->name,
>> +		CPUIDLE_NAME_LEN - 1);
>> +	strncpy(idle_state->desc, to_of_node(state->fwnode)->name,
>> +		CPUIDLE_NAME_LEN - 1);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool psci_pd_is_provider(struct device_node *np)
>> +{
>> +	struct psci_pd_provider *pd_prov, *it;
>> +
>> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(pd_prov, it, &psci_pd_providers, link) {
>> +		if (pd_prov->node == np)
>> +			return true;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int __init psci_dt_pm_domains_parse_states(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
>> +			struct device_node *cpu_node, u32 *psci_states)
>> +{
>> +	struct genpd_power_state *pd_states;
>> +	struct of_phandle_args args;
>> +	int ret, pd_state_count, i, state_idx, psci_idx;
>> +	u32 cpu_psci_state = psci_states[drv->state_count - 1];
>> +	struct device_node *np = of_node_get(cpu_node);
>> +
>> +	/* Walk the CPU topology to find compatible domain idle states. */
>> +	while (np) {
>> +		ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "power-domains",
>> +					"#power-domain-cells", 0, &args);
>> +		of_node_put(np);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			return 0;
>> +
>> +		np = args.np;
>> +
>> +		/* Verify that the node represents a psci pd provider. */
>> +		if (!psci_pd_is_provider(np)) {
>> +			of_node_put(np);
>> +			return 0;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		/* Parse for compatible domain idle states. */
>> +		ret = psci_pd_parse_states(np, &pd_states, &pd_state_count);
>> +		if (ret) {
>> +			of_node_put(np);
>> +			return ret;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		i = 0;
>> +		while (i < pd_state_count) {
>> +
>> +			state_idx = drv->state_count;
>> +			if (state_idx >= CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX) {
>> +				pr_warn("exceeding max cpuidle states\n");
>> +				of_node_put(np);
>> +				return 0;
>> +			}
>> +
>> +			psci_idx = state_idx + i;
>> +			psci_pd_convert_states(&drv->states[state_idx + i],
>> +					&psci_states[psci_idx], &pd_states[i]);
>> +
>> +			/*
>> +			 * In the hierarchical CPU topology the master PM domain
>> +			 * idle state's DT property, "arm,psci-suspend-param",
>> +			 * don't contain the bits for the idle state of the CPU,
>> +			 * let's add those here.
>> +			 */
>> +			psci_states[psci_idx] |= cpu_psci_state;
> No we can't do that. Refer previous discussions around that.

Thanks for pointing this.

i will remove this in next version, we already have cpu idle state bits 
present in cluster modes.

>
>> +			pr_debug("psci-power-state %#x index %d\n",
>> +				psci_states[psci_idx], psci_idx);
>> +
>> +			drv->state_count++;
>> +			i++;
>> +		}
>> +		psci_pd_free_states(pd_states, pd_state_count);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int __init psci_pd_init(struct device_node *np)
>>   {
>>   	struct generic_pm_domain *pd;
>> @@ -125,11 +228,14 @@ static int __init psci_pd_init(struct device_node *np)
>>   	 * Parse the domain idle states and let genpd manage the state selection
>>   	 * for those being compatible with "domain-idle-state".
>>   	 */
>> -	ret = psci_pd_parse_states(np, &states, &state_count);
>> -	if (ret)
>> -		goto free_name;
>>
>> -	pd->free_states = psci_pd_free_states;
>> +	if (psci_has_osi_support()) {
>> +		ret = psci_pd_parse_states(np, &states, &state_count);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			goto free_name;
>> +		pd->free_states = psci_pd_free_states;
>> +	}
>> +
>>   	pd->name = kbasename(pd->name);
>>   	pd->power_off = psci_pd_power_off;
>>   	pd->states = states;
>> @@ -236,10 +342,6 @@ static int __init psci_idle_init_domains(void)
>>   	if (!np)
>>   		return -ENODEV;
>>
>> -	/* Currently limit the hierarchical topology to be used in OSI mode. */
>> -	if (!psci_has_osi_support())
>> -		goto out;
>> -
>>   	/*
>>   	 * Parse child nodes for the "#power-domain-cells" property and
>>   	 * initialize a genpd/genpd-of-provider pair when it's found.
>> @@ -265,14 +367,16 @@ static int __init psci_idle_init_domains(void)
>>   		goto remove_pd;
>>
>>   	/* Try to enable OSI mode. */
>> -	ret = psci_set_osi_mode();
>> -	if (ret) {
>> -		pr_warn("failed to enable OSI mode: %d\n", ret);
>> -		psci_pd_remove_topology(np);
>> -		goto remove_pd;
>> +	if (psci_has_osi_support()) {
>> +		ret = psci_set_osi_mode();
>> +		if (ret) {
>> +			pr_warn("failed to enable OSI mode: %d\n", ret);
>> +			psci_pd_remove_topology(np);
>> +			goto remove_pd;
>> +		} else
>> +			osi_mode_enabled = true;
>>   	}
>>
>> -	osi_mode_enabled = true;
>>   	of_node_put(np);
>>   	pr_info("Initialized CPU PM domain topology\n");
>>   	return pd_count;
>> @@ -293,9 +397,6 @@ struct device __init *psci_dt_attach_cpu(int cpu)
>>   {
>>   	struct device *dev;
>>
>> -	if (!osi_mode_enabled)
>> -		return NULL;
>> -
>>   	dev = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(get_cpu_device(cpu), "psci");
>>   	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev))
>>   		return dev;
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
>> index edd7a54..3fa2aee 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
>> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static inline int psci_enter_state(int idx, u32 state)
>>   	return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PARAM(psci_cpu_suspend_enter, idx, state);
>>   }
>>
>> -static int psci_enter_domain_idle_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>> +int psci_enter_domain_idle_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>>   					struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int idx)
>>   {
>>   	struct psci_cpuidle_data *data = this_cpu_ptr(&psci_cpuidle_data);
>> @@ -193,24 +193,29 @@ static int __init psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
>>   		goto free_mem;
>>   	}
>>
>> -	/* Currently limit the hierarchical topology to be used in OSI mode. */
>> -	if (psci_has_osi_support()) {
>> -		data->dev = psci_dt_attach_cpu(cpu);
>> -		if (IS_ERR(data->dev)) {
>> -			ret = PTR_ERR(data->dev);
>> +	if (!psci_has_osi_support()) {
>> +		ret = psci_dt_pm_domains_parse_states(drv, cpu_node,
>> +					      psci_states);
>> +		if (ret)
>>   			goto free_mem;
>> -		}
>> -
>> -		/*
>> -		 * Using the deepest state for the CPU to trigger a potential
>> -		 * selection of a shared state for the domain, assumes the
>> -		 * domain states are all deeper states.
>> -		 */
>> -		if (data->dev) {
>> -			drv->states[state_count - 1].enter =
>> -				psci_enter_domain_idle_state;
>> -			psci_cpuidle_use_cpuhp = true;
>> -		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	data->dev = psci_dt_attach_cpu(cpu);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(data->dev)) {
>> +		ret = PTR_ERR(data->dev);
>> +		goto free_mem;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Using the deepest state for the CPU to trigger a potential
>> +	 * selection of a shared state for the domain, assumes the
>> +	 * domain states are all deeper states.
>> +	 */
>> +
>> +	if (data->dev) {
>> +		drv->states[state_count - 1].enter =
>> +			psci_enter_domain_idle_state;
>> +		psci_cpuidle_use_cpuhp = true;
>>   	}
>>
>>   	/* Idle states parsed correctly, store them in the per-cpu struct. */
> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ