[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9fc3e36d-18c2-c5fb-2fed-7ffcef817692@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 09:38:11 +0530
From: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
To: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
"Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX"
<vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@...ux.intel.com>,
Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschmidt@...il.com>,
Tien-Fong Chee <tien.fong.chee@...el.com>,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
CC: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
<cheol.yong.kim@...el.com>, <qi-ming.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] spi: cadence-quadpsi: Add support for the Cadence
QSPI controller
Hi Dinh,
On 04/02/20 9:27 pm, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
[...]
>>>> Already I checked that Graham Moore <grmoore@...nsource.altera.com>
>>>> who has submitted the existing driver patches to upstream,
>>>> His mail-id is bouncing back, then I decided that you are the right
>>>> person to ask, could you please add them in loop if you know the team
>>>> (socfpga platform engineers).
>
> Thanks for including Graham, but he's moved on to a different career
> that no longer includes Linux.
>
>>> OK, done that. I mainly know them from U-Boot development, so I'm not
>>> sure
>>> who's responsible for the Linux drivers...
>> Thank you for adding the team and respective members, let's see.
>>
>
> I don't have the original patch series, but will monitor going forward.
> As long as the new driver does not break legacy SoCFPGA products that
> use the cadence-quadspi driver then it should be ok.
>
The legacy driver under drivers/mtd/spi-nor will be removed as we cannot
support both SPI NOR and SPI NAND with single driver if its under
spi-nor. New driver should be functionally equivalent to existing one.
So I suggest you test this driver on legcay SoCFPGA products.
--
Regards
Vignesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists