[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200205060953.49167-1-swboyd@chromium.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 22:09:53 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>,
Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH] genirq: Clarify that irq wake state is orthogonal to enable/disable
There's some confusion around if an irq that's disabled with
disable_irq() can still wake the system from sleep states such as
"suspend to RAM". Let's clarify this in the kernel documentation for
irq_set_irq_wake() so that it's clear that an irq can be disabled and
still wake the system if it has been marked for wakeup.
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
---
kernel/irq/manage.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index 818b2802d3e7..fa8db98c8699 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -731,6 +731,11 @@ static int set_irq_wake_real(unsigned int irq, unsigned int on)
*
* Wakeup mode lets this IRQ wake the system from sleep
* states like "suspend to RAM".
+ *
+ * Note: irq enable/disable state is completely orthogonal
+ * to the enable/disable state of irq wake. An irq can be
+ * disabled with disable_irq() and still wake the system as
+ * long as the irq has wake enabled.
*/
int irq_set_irq_wake(unsigned int irq, unsigned int on)
{
--
Sent by a computer, using git, on the internet
Powered by blists - more mailing lists