[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <749a1db94df00278ec9f5c121cd937fe@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 14:31:45 +0800
From: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: asutoshd@...eaurora.org, nguyenb@...eaurora.org,
hongwus@...eaurora.org, rnayak@...eaurora.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
saravanak@...gle.com, salyzyn@...gle.com,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@...eaurora.org>,
Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
"open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Fix registers dump vops caused scheduling
while atomic
On 2020-02-05 14:21, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 2020-02-04 22:06, Can Guo wrote:
>> @@ -5617,7 +5622,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ufshcd_check_errors(struct
>>
>> __func__, hba->saved_err,
>> hba->saved_uic_err);
>>
>> - ufshcd_print_host_regs(hba);
>> + __ufshcd_print_host_regs(hba, true);
>> ufshcd_print_pwr_info(hba);
>> ufshcd_print_tmrs(hba,
>> hba->outstanding_tasks);
>> ufshcd_print_trs(hba,
>> hba->outstanding_reqs,
>
> Hi Can,
>
> Please fix this by splitting ufs_qcom_dump_dbg_regs() into two
> functions: one function that doesn't sleep and a second function that
> behaves identically to the current function. If the function names will
> make it clear which function sleeps and which function doesn't that
> will
> result in code that is much easier to read than the above code. For the
> above code it is namely impossible to figure out what will happen
> without looking up the caller.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
Hi Bart,
Do you mean by splitting ufshcd_print_host_regs() into two functions?
One behaves identically same to the current function, another one called
ufshcd_print_host_regs_nosleep(). No?
Thanks,
Can Guo.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists