linux-kernel - Re: [put pull] timestamp stuff

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wivZdF6tNERQp+CXyz7zeN4uG9O4d7mZhCrp3anJ29Arg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 5 Feb 2020 06:53:07 +0000
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [put pull] timestamp stuff

On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 3:00 PM Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
>         More 64bit timestamp work

Heh. pr-tracker-bot is not replying to your pull request, because you
misspelled the subject line ("put pull").

But pr-tracker-bot _also_ isn't responding to the one where that
wasn't the case:

   [git pull] kernel-initiated rm -rf on ramfs-style filesystems

and I'm not seeing why that one wasn't picked up. But it seems to be
because it never made it to lore.

I see

  To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
  Cc: fsdevel.@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
  Subject: [git pull] kernel-initiated rm -rf on ramfs-style filesystems
  Message-ID: <20200204150912.GS23230@...IV.linux.org.uk>

on that other message in my mailbox, but I don't see it on lore. Odd.
Is it because the "fsdevel" address is mis-spelled on the Cc line?
Strange.

Anyway, both pull requests pulled, even though neither got a
pr-tracker-bot response for two apparently very different reasons.

               Linus