[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877e11h0ir.fsf@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 10:00:12 +0100
From: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc: lijiang <lijiang@...hat.com>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] printk: replace ringbuffer
On 2020-02-05, Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com> wrote:
>>>> So there is a General protection fault. That's the type of a
>>>> problem that kills the boot for me as well (different backtrace,
>>>> tho).
>>>
>>> Do you have CONFIG_RELOCATABLE and CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE (KASLR)
>>> enabled?
>>
>> Yes. These two options are enabled.
>>
>> CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y
>> CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE=y
>
> So KASLR kills the boot for me. So does KASAN.
Sergey, thanks for looking into this already!
> John, do you see any of these problems on your test machine?
For x86 I have only been using qemu. (For hardware tests I use arm64-smp
in order to verify memory barriers.) With qemu-x86_64 I am unable to
reproduce the problem.
Lianbo, thanks for the report. Can you share your boot args? Anything
special in there (like log_buf_len=, earlyprintk, etc)?
Also, could you share your CONFIG_LOG_* and CONFIG_PRINTK_* options?
I will move to bare metal x86_64 and hopefully see it as well.
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists