lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <08ff9caa-0473-fae3-6f98-8530ed4c3b1a@sony.com>
Date:   Wed, 5 Feb 2020 09:49:30 +0000
From:   "Enderborg, Peter" <Peter.Enderborg@...y.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        "syzbot+09ef48aa58261464b621@...kaller.appspotmail.com" 
        <syzbot+09ef48aa58261464b621@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 17/78] HID: Fix slab-out-of-bounds read in
 hid_field_extract (Broken!)

On 2/5/20 10:32 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 08:12:27AM +0100, peter enderborg wrote:
>> On 1/14/20 11:00 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
>>>
>>> commit 8ec321e96e056de84022c032ffea253431a83c3c upstream.
>>>
>>> The syzbot fuzzer found a slab-out-of-bounds bug in the HID report
>>> handler.  The bug was caused by a report descriptor which included a
>>> field with size 12 bits and count 4899, for a total size of 7349
>>> bytes.
>>>
>>> The usbhid driver uses at most a single-page 4-KB buffer for reports.
>>> In the test there wasn't any problem about overflowing the buffer,
>>> since only one byte was received from the device.  Rather, the bug
>>> occurred when the HID core tried to extract the data from the report
>>> fields, which caused it to try reading data beyond the end of the
>>> allocated buffer.
>>>
>>> This patch fixes the problem by rejecting any report whose total
>>> length exceeds the HID_MAX_BUFFER_SIZE limit (minus one byte to allow
>>> for a possible report index).  In theory a device could have a report
>>> longer than that, but if there was such a thing we wouldn't handle it
>>> correctly anyway.
>>>
>>> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+09ef48aa58261464b621@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>>> Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
>>> CC: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
>>> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/hid/hid-core.c |    6 ++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
>>> @@ -288,6 +288,12 @@ static int hid_add_field(struct hid_pars
>>>  	offset = report->size;
>>>  	report->size += parser->global.report_size * parser->global.report_count;
>>>  
>>> +	/* Total size check: Allow for possible report index byte */
>>> +	if (report->size > (HID_MAX_BUFFER_SIZE - 1) << 3) {
>>> +		hid_err(parser->device, "report is too long\n");
>>> +		return -1;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>>  	if (!parser->local.usage_index) /* Ignore padding fields */
>>>  		return 0;
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> This patch breaks Elgato StreamDeck.
> Does that mean the device is broken with a too-large of a report?

Yes.

> Is it broken in Linus's tree?  If so, can you work with the HID
> developers to fix it there so we can backport the fix to all stable
> trees?

I cant see that there are any other fixes upon this so I dont think so. I can try.  

Jiri is in the loop. I guess he is the "HID developers" ?

>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ