[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200205143426.2592512-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 15:34:26 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Karol Herbst <karolherbst@...il.com>,
Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/mm/kmmio: Use this_cpu_ptr() instead get_cpu_var() for kmmio_ctx
Both call sites, that access kmmio_ctx, access kmmio_ctx with interrupts
disabled. There is no need to use get_cpu_var() which additionally
disables preemption.
Use this_cpu_ptr() to access the kmmio_ctx variable of the current CPU.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---
arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c | 10 +++-------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c b/arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c
index 49d7814b59a9b..9994353fb75de 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ int kmmio_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long addr)
goto no_kmmio;
}
- ctx = &get_cpu_var(kmmio_ctx);
+ ctx = this_cpu_ptr(&kmmio_ctx);
if (ctx->active) {
if (page_base == ctx->addr) {
/*
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ int kmmio_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long addr)
pr_emerg("previous hit was at 0x%08lx.\n", ctx->addr);
disarm_kmmio_fault_page(faultpage);
}
- goto no_kmmio_ctx;
+ goto no_kmmio;
}
ctx->active++;
@@ -314,11 +314,8 @@ int kmmio_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long addr)
* the user should drop to single cpu before tracing.
*/
- put_cpu_var(kmmio_ctx);
return 1; /* fault handled */
-no_kmmio_ctx:
- put_cpu_var(kmmio_ctx);
no_kmmio:
rcu_read_unlock();
preempt_enable_no_resched();
@@ -333,7 +330,7 @@ int kmmio_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long addr)
static int post_kmmio_handler(unsigned long condition, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
int ret = 0;
- struct kmmio_context *ctx = &get_cpu_var(kmmio_ctx);
+ struct kmmio_context *ctx = this_cpu_ptr(&kmmio_ctx);
if (!ctx->active) {
/*
@@ -371,7 +368,6 @@ static int post_kmmio_handler(unsigned long condition, struct pt_regs *regs)
if (!(regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_TF))
ret = 1;
out:
- put_cpu_var(kmmio_ctx);
return ret;
}
--
2.25.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists