linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/90] 5.4.18-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200205193008.GC1327971@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 5 Feb 2020 19:30:08 +0000
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/90] 5.4.18-stable review

On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 08:24:29AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 03:13:57PM +0000, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 06:37:38AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On 2/3/20 8:19 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.18 release.
> > > > There are 90 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > > 
> > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 05 Feb 2020 16:17:59 +0000.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Building i386:allyesconfig ... failed
> > > Building i386:allmodconfig ... failed
> > > --------------
> > > Error log:
> > > In file included from arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c:2:
> > > include/linux/dma-direct.h:29:20: error: conflicting types for 'dma_capable'
> > >    29 | static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size,
> > >       |                    ^~~~~~~~~~~
> > > In file included from include/linux/dma-direct.h:12,
> > >                  from arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c:2:
> > > arch/x86/include/asm/dma-direct.h:5:6: note: previous declaration of 'dma_capable' was here
> > >     5 | bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size);
> > 
> > Ok, I think this is now resolved with a patch that Sasha added.
> > 
> > I have pushed out a -rc4 that _should_ build and boot properly.
> > 
> The i386 build still fails with v5.4.17-99-gbd0c6624a110 (-rc4).

Crap.

Ok, let me get some food and then try to figure this out...

greg k-h