lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 05 Feb 2020 11:40:21 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     agross@...nel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, jshriram@...eaurora.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        mturquette@...libre.com, psodagud@...eaurora.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, tdas@...eaurora.org, tsoni@...eaurora.org,
        vinod.koul@...aro.org, vnkgutta@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] clk: qcom: gcc: Add global clock controller driver for SM8250

Quoting Venkata Narendra Kumar Gutta (2020-01-24 14:32:26)
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sm8250.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sm8250.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..300187e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sm8250.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,3720 @@
[...]
> +
> +static const struct parent_map gcc_parent_map_0[] = {
> +       { P_BI_TCXO, 0 },
> +       { P_GPLL0_OUT_MAIN, 1 },
> +       { P_GPLL0_OUT_EVEN, 6 },
> +       { P_CORE_BI_PLL_TEST_SE, 7 },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct clk_parent_data gcc_parent_data_0[] = {
> +       { .fw_name = "bi_tcxo" },
> +       { .hw = &gpll0.clkr.hw },
> +       { .hw = &gpll0_out_even.clkr.hw },
> +       { .fw_name = "core_bi_pll_test_se", .name = "core_bi_pll_test_se" },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct clk_parent_data gcc_parent_data_0_ao[] = {
> +       { .fw_name = "bi_tcxo_ao" },
> +       { .hw = &gpll0.clkr.hw },
> +       { .hw = &gpll0_out_even.clkr.hw },
> +       { .fw_name = "core_bi_pll_test_se", .name = "core_bi_pll_test_se" },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct parent_map gcc_parent_map_1[] = {
> +       { P_BI_TCXO, 0 },
> +       { P_GPLL0_OUT_MAIN, 1 },
> +       { P_SLEEP_CLK, 5 },
> +       { P_GPLL0_OUT_EVEN, 6 },
> +       { P_CORE_BI_PLL_TEST_SE, 7 },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct clk_parent_data gcc_parent_data_1[] = {
> +       { .fw_name = "bi_tcxo" },
> +       { .hw = &gpll0.clkr.hw },
> +       { .fw_name = "sleep_clk", .name = "sleep_clk" },

Please drop .name

> +       { .hw = &gpll0_out_even.clkr.hw },
> +       { .fw_name = "core_bi_pll_test_se", .name = "core_bi_pll_test_se" },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct parent_map gcc_parent_map_2[] = {
> +       { P_BI_TCXO, 0 },
> +       { P_SLEEP_CLK, 5 },
> +       { P_CORE_BI_PLL_TEST_SE, 7 },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct clk_parent_data gcc_parent_data_2[] = {
> +       { .fw_name = "bi_tcxo" },
> +       { .fw_name = "sleep_clk", .name = "sleep_clk" },

Please drop .name

> +       { .fw_name = "core_bi_pll_test_se", .name = "core_bi_pll_test_se" },
> +};
> +
[...]
> +static const struct clk_parent_data gcc_parent_data_5[] = {
> +       { .fw_name = "bi_tcxo" },
> +       { .hw = &gpll0.clkr.hw },
> +       { .fw_name = "aud_ref_clk", .name = "aud_ref_clk" },

Why have .name? Pleas remove it.

> +       { .hw = &gpll0_out_even.clkr.hw },
> +       { .fw_name = "core_bi_pll_test_se", .name = "core_bi_pll_test_se" },

Please drop these test inputs. I don't see any reason why they're listed.

> +};
> +
> +static const struct freq_tbl ftbl_gcc_cpuss_ahb_clk_src[] = {
> +       F(19200000, P_BI_TCXO, 1, 0, 0),
> +       { }
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_branch gcc_sys_noc_cpuss_ahb_clk = {
> +       .halt_reg = 0x48198,
> +       .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT_VOTED,
> +       .clkr = {
> +               .enable_reg = 0x52000,
> +               .enable_mask = BIT(0),
> +               .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> +                       .name = "gcc_sys_noc_cpuss_ahb_clk",
> +                       .parent_data = &(const struct clk_parent_data){
> +                               .hw = &gcc_cpuss_ahb_postdiv_clk_src.clkr.hw,
> +                       },
> +                       .num_parents = 1,
> +                       .flags = CLK_IS_CRITICAL | CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
> +                       .ops = &clk_branch2_ops,
> +               },
> +       },
> +};

Is there a need for this clk to be exposed? Why can't we just turn the
bit on in probe and ignore it after that? I'd prefer to not have
CLK_IS_CRITICAL in this driver unless necessary.

> +
> +static struct clk_branch gcc_tsif_ahb_clk = {
> +       .halt_reg = 0x36004,
> +       .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT_VOTED,
> +       .clkr = {
> +               .enable_reg = 0x36004,
> +               .enable_mask = BIT(0),
> +               .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> +                       .name = "gcc_tsif_ahb_clk",
> +                       .ops = &clk_branch2_ops,
> +               },
> +       },
> +};
> +
[...]
> +
> +
> +static int gcc_sm8250_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +       struct regmap *regmap;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       regmap = qcom_cc_map(pdev, &gcc_sm8250_desc);
> +       if (IS_ERR(regmap))
> +               return PTR_ERR(regmap);
> +
> +       /*
> +        * Disable the GPLL0 active input to NPU and GPU
> +        * via MISC registers.
> +        */
> +       regmap_update_bits(regmap, 0x4d110, 0x3, 0x3);
> +       regmap_update_bits(regmap, 0x71028, 0x3, 0x3);
> +
> +       /*
> +        * Keep the clocks always-ON
> +        * GCC_VIDEO_AHB_CLK, GCC_CAMERA_AHB_CLK, GCC_DISP_AHB_CLK,
> +        * GCC_CPUSS_DVM_BUS_CLK, GCC_GPU_CFG_AHB_CLK
> +        */
> +       regmap_update_bits(regmap, 0x0b004, BIT(0), BIT(0));
> +       regmap_update_bits(regmap, 0x0b008, BIT(0), BIT(0));
> +       regmap_update_bits(regmap, 0x0b00c, BIT(0), BIT(0));
> +       regmap_update_bits(regmap, 0x4818c, BIT(0), BIT(0));
> +       regmap_update_bits(regmap, 0x71004, BIT(0), BIT(0));

These look like the AHB clks above that we just enabled and then ignore.

> +
> +       ret = qcom_cc_register_rcg_dfs(regmap, gcc_dfs_clocks,
> +                                      ARRAY_SIZE(gcc_dfs_clocks));
> +       if (ret)
> +               return ret;
> +
> +       return qcom_cc_really_probe(pdev, &gcc_sm8250_desc, regmap);
> +}

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ