[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPUE2uvJuNYc=MnGZfwT=hUzEJoRAoST-aT=xKfrTOZQ=5wgwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 11:42:14 -0800
From: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>
To: Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Fabien Lahoudere <fabien.lahoudere@...labora.com>,
"open list:IIO SUBSYSTEM AND DRIVERS" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/17] iio: cros_ec: Use cros_ec_cmd()
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 11:13 AM Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Replace cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status() with cros_ec_cmd()
> which does the message buffer setup and cleanup.
>
> For one other usage, replace the cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status() call with a
> call to cros_ec_cmd_xfer(), in preparation for the removal of the former
> function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org>
Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Updated to use new function name and parameter list.
> - Used C99 element setting to initialize param struct.
> - For second usage, replaced cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status() with
> cros_ec_cmd_xfer() which is functionally similar.
>
> .../cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c | 25 +++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c b/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
> index d3a3626c7cd834..94e22e7d927631 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
> @@ -30,24 +30,15 @@ static int cros_ec_get_host_cmd_version_mask(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev,
> u16 cmd_offset, u16 cmd, u32 *mask)
> {
> int ret;
> - struct {
> - struct cros_ec_command msg;
> - union {
> - struct ec_params_get_cmd_versions params;
> - struct ec_response_get_cmd_versions resp;
> - };
> - } __packed buf = {
> - .msg = {
> - .command = EC_CMD_GET_CMD_VERSIONS + cmd_offset,
> - .insize = sizeof(struct ec_response_get_cmd_versions),
> - .outsize = sizeof(struct ec_params_get_cmd_versions)
> - },
> - .params = {.cmd = cmd}
> + struct ec_params_get_cmd_versions params = {
> + .cmd = cmd,
> };
> + struct ec_response_get_cmd_versions resp = {0};
>
> - ret = cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status(ec_dev, &buf.msg);
> + ret = cros_ec_cmd(ec_dev, 0, EC_CMD_GET_CMD_VERSIONS + cmd_offset,
> + ¶ms, sizeof(params), &resp, sizeof(resp), NULL);
> if (ret >= 0)
> - *mask = buf.resp.version_mask;
> + *mask = resp.version_mask;
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -171,9 +162,11 @@ int cros_ec_motion_send_host_cmd(struct cros_ec_sensors_core_state *state,
>
> memcpy(state->msg->data, &state->param, sizeof(state->param));
>
> - ret = cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status(state->ec, state->msg);
> + ret = cros_ec_cmd_xfer(state->ec, state->msg);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> + else if (state->msg->result != EC_RES_SUCCESS)
> + return -EPROTO;
>
> if (ret &&
> state->resp != (struct ec_response_motion_sense *)state->msg->data)
> --
> 2.25.0.341.g760bfbb309-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists