linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] 9pnet: allow making incomplete read requests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 6 Feb 2020 01:06:07 +0300
From:   l29ah@...k.li
To:     Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
Cc:     Sergey Alirzaev <l29ah@...k.li>,
        v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
        Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 9pnet: allow making incomplete read requests

On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 10:54:46PM +0100, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> > [...]
> > +		if (n != count) {
> > +			*err = -EFAULT;
> > +			p9_tag_remove(clnt, req);
> > +			return n;
> >  		}
> > -		p9_tag_remove(clnt, req);
> > +	} else {
> > +		iov_iter_advance(to, count);
> > +		count;
> 
> Any reason for this stray 'count;' statement?
> If you're ok with this I'll just take patch without that line, don't
> bother resubmitting.

No reason, i've just accidentally left it.

> Will take a fair amount of time to make it to linux-next though, test
> setup needs some love and I want to run tests even if this should be
> straightforward...

Thanks!

-- 
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail
/\  http://arc.pasp.de/   - against proprietary attachments