linux-kernel - [PATCH] drm: Add missing newline after comment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <586aab08af596120f48858005bb6784c83035d59.1580941448.git.stefan@agner.ch>
Date:   Wed,  5 Feb 2020 23:26:00 +0100
From:   Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
To:     maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org,
        sean@...rly.run, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel.vetter@...ll.ch
Cc:     airlied@...hat.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
        Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
Subject: [PATCH] drm: Add missing newline after comment

Clang prints a warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c:363:6: warning: misleading indentation;
statement is not part of the previous 'if' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
         */     mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
                ^
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c:357:2: note: previous statement is here
        if (!drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_LEGACY))
        ^

Fix this by adding a newline after the multi-line comment.

Fixes: 058ca50ce3f1 ("drm/legacy: move lock cleanup for master into lock file (v2)")
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/855
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c
index 2e8ce99d0baa..2c79e8199e3c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c
@@ -360,7 +360,8 @@ void drm_legacy_lock_master_cleanup(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_master *m
 	/*
 	 * Since the master is disappearing, so is the
 	 * possibility to lock.
-	 */	mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+	 */
+	mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 	if (master->lock.hw_lock) {
 		if (dev->sigdata.lock == master->lock.hw_lock)
 			dev->sigdata.lock = NULL;
-- 
2.25.0