linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] clk: Don't cache errors from clk_ops::get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1jv9okazq9.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com>
Date:   Thu, 06 Feb 2020 09:26:06 +0100
From:   Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
To:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] clk: Don't cache errors from clk_ops::get_phase()


On Thu 06 Feb 2020 at 00:27, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> wrote:

> We don't check for errors from clk_ops::get_phase() before storing away
> the result into the clk_core::phase member. This can lead to some fairly
> confusing debugfs information if these ops do return an error. Let's
> skip the store when this op fails to fix this. While we're here, move
> the locking outside of clk_core_get_phase() to simplify callers from
> the debugfs side.
>
> Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
> Cc: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/clk.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index d529ad67805c..26213e82f5f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -2660,12 +2660,14 @@ static int clk_core_get_phase(struct clk_core *core)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	clk_prepare_lock();

Should the function name get the "_nolock" suffix then ?

> +	lockdep_assert_held(&prepare_lock);
> +	if (!core->ops->get_phase)
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	/* Always try to update cached phase if possible */
> -	if (core->ops->get_phase)
> -		core->phase = core->ops->get_phase(core->hw);
> -	ret = core->phase;
> -	clk_prepare_unlock();
> +	ret = core->ops->get_phase(core->hw);
> +	if (ret >= 0)
> +		core->phase = ret;
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -2679,10 +2681,16 @@ static int clk_core_get_phase(struct clk_core *core)
>   */
>  int clk_get_phase(struct clk *clk)
>  {
> +	int ret;
> +
>  	if (!clk)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	return clk_core_get_phase(clk->core);
> +	clk_prepare_lock();
> +	ret = clk_core_get_phase(clk->core);
> +	clk_prepare_unlock();
> +
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_get_phase);
>  
> @@ -2896,13 +2904,21 @@ static struct hlist_head *orphan_list[] = {
>  static void clk_summary_show_one(struct seq_file *s, struct clk_core *c,
>  				 int level)
>  {
> -	seq_printf(s, "%*s%-*s %7d %8d %8d %11lu %10lu %5d %6d\n",
> +	int phase;
> +
> +	seq_printf(s, "%*s%-*s %7d %8d %8d %11lu %10lu ",
>  		   level * 3 + 1, "",
>  		   30 - level * 3, c->name,
>  		   c->enable_count, c->prepare_count, c->protect_count,
> -		   clk_core_get_rate(c), clk_core_get_accuracy(c),
> -		   clk_core_get_phase(c),
> -		   clk_core_get_scaled_duty_cycle(c, 100000));
> +		   clk_core_get_rate(c), clk_core_get_accuracy(c));
> +
> +	phase = clk_core_get_phase(c);
> +	if (phase >= 0)
> +		seq_printf(s, "%5d", phase);
> +	else
> +		seq_puts(s, "-----");
> +
> +	seq_printf(s, " %6d\n", clk_core_get_scaled_duty_cycle(c, 100000));
>  }
>  
>  static void clk_summary_show_subtree(struct seq_file *s, struct clk_core *c,
> @@ -2939,6 +2955,7 @@ DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(clk_summary);
>  
>  static void clk_dump_one(struct seq_file *s, struct clk_core *c, int level)
>  {
> +	int phase;
>  	unsigned long min_rate, max_rate;
>  
>  	clk_core_get_boundaries(c, &min_rate, &max_rate);
> @@ -2952,7 +2969,9 @@ static void clk_dump_one(struct seq_file *s, struct clk_core *c, int level)
>  	seq_printf(s, "\"min_rate\": %lu,", min_rate);
>  	seq_printf(s, "\"max_rate\": %lu,", max_rate);
>  	seq_printf(s, "\"accuracy\": %lu,", clk_core_get_accuracy(c));
> -	seq_printf(s, "\"phase\": %d,", clk_core_get_phase(c));
> +	phase = clk_core_get_phase(c);
> +	if (phase >= 0)
> +		seq_printf(s, "\"phase\": %d,", phase);
>  	seq_printf(s, "\"duty_cycle\": %u",
>  		   clk_core_get_scaled_duty_cycle(c, 100000));
>  }
> @@ -3434,14 +3453,11 @@ static int __clk_core_init(struct clk_core *core)
>  		core->accuracy = 0;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Set clk's phase.
> +	 * Set clk's phase by clk_core_get_phase() caching the phase.
>  	 * Since a phase is by definition relative to its parent, just
>  	 * query the current clock phase, or just assume it's in phase.
>  	 */
> -	if (core->ops->get_phase)
> -		core->phase = core->ops->get_phase(core->hw);
> -	else
> -		core->phase = 0;
> +	clk_core_get_phase(core);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Set clk's duty cycle.