[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <14e4919a-0089-c2e7-567c-1e7fcfef9769@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 10:00:23 +0000
From: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>
To: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>, linux@...linux.org.uk
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, arnd@...db.de,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, nsekhar@...com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bgolaszewski@...libre.com,
benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org, mchehab+samsung@...nel.org,
armlinux@...isordat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Vincenzo Frascino <Vincenzo.Frascino@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: make kexec depend on MMU
On 2/5/20 10:43 PM, Stefan Agner wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
>
> arm nommu config with KEXEC enabled doesn't compile
> arch/arm/kernel/setup.c: In function 'reserve_crashkernel':
> arch/arm/kernel/setup.c:1005:25: error: 'SECTION_SIZE' undeclared (first
> use in this function)
> crash_size, SECTION_SIZE);
>
> since 61603016e212 ("ARM: kexec: fix crashkernel= handling") which is
> over one year without anybody noticing. I have only noticed beause of
> my testing nommu config which somehow gained CONFIG_KEXEC without
> an intention. This suggests that nobody is actually using KEXEC
> on nommu ARM configs. It is even a question whether kexec works with
> nommu.
>
> Make KEXEC depend on MMU to make this clear. If somebody wants to enable
> there will be probably more things to take care.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> Reviewed-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
> ---
> arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> index 96dab76da3b3..59ce8943151f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -1906,6 +1906,7 @@ config KEXEC
> bool "Kexec system call (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> depends on (!SMP || PM_SLEEP_SMP)
> depends on !CPU_V7M
> + depends on MMU
> select KEXEC_CORE
> help
> kexec is a system call that implements the ability to shutdown your
>
Vincenzo sent similar patch [1] some time ago. I prefer his patch since CPU_V7M already imply !MMU.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20200110123125.51092-1-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com/T/
Cheers
Vladimir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists