lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c2a9d048-6a33-f357-ac88-4eb81002fe93@kontron.de>
Date:   Thu, 6 Feb 2020 10:37:44 +0000
From:   Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>
To:     Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>,
        Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "Sascha Hauer" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        "Anson Huang" <anson.huang@....com>, Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>
CC:     Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clk: imx8mm: Switch to platform driver

On 06.02.20 11:34, Schrempf Frieder wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 09.07.19 16:20, Abel Vesa wrote:
>> There is no strong reason for this to use CLK_OF_DECLARE instead
>> of being a platform driver. Plus, this will now be aligned with the
>> other i.MX8M clock drivers which are platform drivers.
>>
>> In order to make the clock provider a platform driver
>> all the data and code needs to be outside of .init section.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>
>> Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> 
> This has been upstream for quite some time now, but somehow I have an
> issue with SPI on the i.MX8MM that gets resolved when I revert this patch.
> 
> When I try to probe an SPI NOR flash with latest 5.4 or even 5.5:
> 
> 	spi_imx 30820000.spi: dma setup error -19, use pio
> 	spi-nor spi0.0: unrecognized JEDEC id bytes: 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 	spi_imx 30820000.spi: probed
> 
> When I revert this patch:
> 
> 	spi_imx 30820000.spi: dma setup error -19, use pio
> 	spi-nor spi0.0: mx25r1635f (2048 Kbytes)
> 	spi_imx 30820000.spi: probed
> 
> Please note, that in both cases I have disabled DMA, as this causes even
> more trouble (see [1]). But even with DMA enabled and ignoring the DMA
> errors, the issue described above occurs.
> 
> Does someone have an idea what's wrong?
> Am I the only user of SPI on i.MX8MM as this issue seems to exist
> upstream since v5.4-rc1?
> 
> Thanks,
> Frieder

Sorry forgot the link:

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1086459/

> 
>> ---
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>>    * Switched to platform driver memory mapping API
>>    * Removed extra newline
>>    * Added an explanation of why this change is done
>>      in the commit message
>>
>>    drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8mm.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>>    1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8mm.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8mm.c
>> index 6b8e75d..7a8e713 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8mm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8mm.c
>> @@ -68,43 +68,43 @@ static const struct imx_pll14xx_rate_table imx8mm_drampll_tbl[] = {
>>    	PLL_1443X_RATE(650000000U, 325, 3, 2, 0),
>>    };
>>    
>> -static struct imx_pll14xx_clk imx8mm_audio_pll __initdata = {
>> +static struct imx_pll14xx_clk imx8mm_audio_pll = {
>>    		.type = PLL_1443X,
>>    		.rate_table = imx8mm_audiopll_tbl,
>>    		.rate_count = ARRAY_SIZE(imx8mm_audiopll_tbl),
>>    };
>>    
>> -static struct imx_pll14xx_clk imx8mm_video_pll __initdata = {
>> +static struct imx_pll14xx_clk imx8mm_video_pll = {
>>    		.type = PLL_1443X,
>>    		.rate_table = imx8mm_videopll_tbl,
>>    		.rate_count = ARRAY_SIZE(imx8mm_videopll_tbl),
>>    };
>>    
>> -static struct imx_pll14xx_clk imx8mm_dram_pll __initdata = {
>> +static struct imx_pll14xx_clk imx8mm_dram_pll = {
>>    		.type = PLL_1443X,
>>    		.rate_table = imx8mm_drampll_tbl,
>>    		.rate_count = ARRAY_SIZE(imx8mm_drampll_tbl),
>>    };
>>    
>> -static struct imx_pll14xx_clk imx8mm_arm_pll __initdata = {
>> +static struct imx_pll14xx_clk imx8mm_arm_pll = {
>>    		.type = PLL_1416X,
>>    		.rate_table = imx8mm_pll1416x_tbl,
>>    		.rate_count = ARRAY_SIZE(imx8mm_pll1416x_tbl),
>>    };
>>    
>> -static struct imx_pll14xx_clk imx8mm_gpu_pll __initdata = {
>> +static struct imx_pll14xx_clk imx8mm_gpu_pll = {
>>    		.type = PLL_1416X,
>>    		.rate_table = imx8mm_pll1416x_tbl,
>>    		.rate_count = ARRAY_SIZE(imx8mm_pll1416x_tbl),
>>    };
>>    
>> -static struct imx_pll14xx_clk imx8mm_vpu_pll __initdata = {
>> +static struct imx_pll14xx_clk imx8mm_vpu_pll = {
>>    		.type = PLL_1416X,
>>    		.rate_table = imx8mm_pll1416x_tbl,
>>    		.rate_count = ARRAY_SIZE(imx8mm_pll1416x_tbl),
>>    };
>>    
>> -static struct imx_pll14xx_clk imx8mm_sys_pll __initdata = {
>> +static struct imx_pll14xx_clk imx8mm_sys_pll = {
>>    		.type = PLL_1416X,
>>    		.rate_table = imx8mm_pll1416x_tbl,
>>    		.rate_count = ARRAY_SIZE(imx8mm_pll1416x_tbl),
>> @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ static const char *imx8mm_clko1_sels[] = {"osc_24m", "sys_pll1_800m", "osc_27m",
>>    static struct clk *clks[IMX8MM_CLK_END];
>>    static struct clk_onecell_data clk_data;
>>    
>> -static struct clk ** const uart_clks[] __initconst = {
>> +static struct clk ** const uart_clks[] = {
>>    	&clks[IMX8MM_CLK_UART1_ROOT],
>>    	&clks[IMX8MM_CLK_UART2_ROOT],
>>    	&clks[IMX8MM_CLK_UART3_ROOT],
>> @@ -382,19 +382,20 @@ static struct clk ** const uart_clks[] __initconst = {
>>    	NULL
>>    };
>>    
>> -static int __init imx8mm_clocks_init(struct device_node *ccm_node)
>> +static int imx8mm_clocks_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>    {
>> -	struct device_node *np;
>> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> +	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>>    	void __iomem *base;
>>    	int ret;
>>    
>>    	clks[IMX8MM_CLK_DUMMY] = imx_clk_fixed("dummy", 0);
>> -	clks[IMX8MM_CLK_24M] = of_clk_get_by_name(ccm_node, "osc_24m");
>> -	clks[IMX8MM_CLK_32K] = of_clk_get_by_name(ccm_node, "osc_32k");
>> -	clks[IMX8MM_CLK_EXT1] = of_clk_get_by_name(ccm_node, "clk_ext1");
>> -	clks[IMX8MM_CLK_EXT2] = of_clk_get_by_name(ccm_node, "clk_ext2");
>> -	clks[IMX8MM_CLK_EXT3] = of_clk_get_by_name(ccm_node, "clk_ext3");
>> -	clks[IMX8MM_CLK_EXT4] = of_clk_get_by_name(ccm_node, "clk_ext4");
>> +	clks[IMX8MM_CLK_24M] = of_clk_get_by_name(np, "osc_24m");
>> +	clks[IMX8MM_CLK_32K] = of_clk_get_by_name(np, "osc_32k");
>> +	clks[IMX8MM_CLK_EXT1] = of_clk_get_by_name(np, "clk_ext1");
>> +	clks[IMX8MM_CLK_EXT2] = of_clk_get_by_name(np, "clk_ext2");
>> +	clks[IMX8MM_CLK_EXT3] = of_clk_get_by_name(np, "clk_ext3");
>> +	clks[IMX8MM_CLK_EXT4] = of_clk_get_by_name(np, "clk_ext4");
>>    
>>    	np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,imx8mm-anatop");
>>    	base = of_iomap(np, 0);
>> @@ -480,10 +481,10 @@ static int __init imx8mm_clocks_init(struct device_node *ccm_node)
>>    	clks[IMX8MM_SYS_PLL2_500M] = imx_clk_fixed_factor("sys_pll2_500m", "sys_pll2_out", 1, 2);
>>    	clks[IMX8MM_SYS_PLL2_1000M] = imx_clk_fixed_factor("sys_pll2_1000m", "sys_pll2_out", 1, 1);
>>    
>> -	np = ccm_node;
>> -	base = of_iomap(np, 0);
>> -	if (WARN_ON(!base))
>> -		return -ENOMEM;
>> +	np = dev->of_node;
>> +	base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
>> +	if (WARN_ON(IS_ERR(base)))
>> +		return PTR_ERR(base);
>>    
>>    	/* Core Slice */
>>    	clks[IMX8MM_CLK_A53_SRC] = imx_clk_mux2("arm_a53_src", base + 0x8000, 24, 3, imx8mm_a53_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(imx8mm_a53_sels));
>> @@ -682,4 +683,18 @@ static int __init imx8mm_clocks_init(struct device_node *ccm_node)
>>    
>>    	return 0;
>>    }
>> -CLK_OF_DECLARE_DRIVER(imx8mm, "fsl,imx8mm-ccm", imx8mm_clocks_init);
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id imx8mm_clk_of_match[] = {
>> +	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-ccm" },
>> +	{ /* Sentinel */ },
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx8mm_clk_of_match);
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver imx8mm_clk_driver = {
>> +	.probe = imx8mm_clocks_probe,
>> +	.driver = {
>> +		.name = "imx8mm-ccm",
>> +		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(imx8mm_clk_of_match),
>> +	},
>> +};
>> +module_platform_driver(imx8mm_clk_driver);
>>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ