[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ftfogfqs.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 11:41:15 +0100
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: linmiaohe <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
pbonzini@...hat.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com,
sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, wanpengli@...cent.com,
jmattson@...gle.com, joro@...tes.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: remove duplicated KVM_REQ_EVENT request
linmiaohe <linmiaohe@...wei.com> writes:
> From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
>
> The KVM_REQ_EVENT request is already made in kvm_set_rflags(). We should
> not make it again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index fbabb2f06273..212282c6fb76 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -8942,7 +8942,6 @@ int kvm_task_switch(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u16 tss_selector, int idt_index,
>
> kvm_rip_write(vcpu, ctxt->eip);
> kvm_set_rflags(vcpu, ctxt->eflags);
> - kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
I would've actually done it the other way around and removed
kvm_make_request() from kvm_set_rflags() as it is not an obvious
behavior (e.g. why kvm_rip_write() doens't do that and kvm_set_rflags()
does ?) adding kvm_make_request() to all call sites.
In case this looks like too big of a change with no particular gain I'd
suggest you at least leave a comment above kvm_set_rflags(), something
like
"kvm_make_request() also requests KVM_REQ_EVENT"
> return 1;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_task_switch);
--
Vitaly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists