[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d0asgfh5.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 11:47:02 +0100
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: linmiaohe <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
pbonzini@...hat.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com,
sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, wanpengli@...cent.com,
jmattson@...gle.com, joro@...tes.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: apic: reuse smp_wmb() in kvm_make_request()
linmiaohe <linmiaohe@...wei.com> writes:
> From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
>
> There is already an smp_mb() barrier in kvm_make_request(). We reuse it
> here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> index eafc631d305c..ea871206a370 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -1080,9 +1080,12 @@ static int __apic_accept_irq(struct kvm_lapic *apic, int delivery_mode,
> result = 1;
> /* assumes that there are only KVM_APIC_INIT/SIPI */
> apic->pending_events = (1UL << KVM_APIC_INIT);
> - /* make sure pending_events is visible before sending
> - * the request */
> - smp_wmb();
> + /*
> + * Make sure pending_events is visible before sending
> + * the request.
> + * There is already an smp_wmb() in kvm_make_request(),
> + * we reuse that barrier here.
> + */
Let me suggest an alternative wording,
"kvm_make_request() provides smp_wmb() so pending_events changes are
guaranteed to be visible"
But there is nothing wrong with yours, it's just longer than it could be
:-)
Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
> kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
> }
--
Vitaly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists