lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200206113250.GV10400@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 6 Feb 2020 13:32:50 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Trond@...ck.fi.intel.com,
        Myklebust@...ck.fi.intel.com, trond.myklebust@...merspace.com,
        Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] kernel.h: Split out min()/max() et al helpers

On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 12:23:53AM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 04/02/2020 18.04, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > kernel.h is being used as a dump for all kinds of stuff for a long time.
> > Here is the attempt to start cleaning it up by splitting out min()/max()
> > et al helpers.
> > 
> > At the same time convert users in header and lib folder to use new header.
> > Though for time being include new header back to kernel.h to avoid twisted
> > indirected includes for existing users.
> 
> This is definitely long overdue, so thanks for taking this on. I think
> minmax.h is fine as a header on its own, but for the other one, I think
> you should go even further - and perhaps all these should go in a
> include/math/ dir (include/linux/ has ~1200 files), so we'd have
> math/minmax.h, math/round.h, math/ilog2.h, math/gcd.h etc., each
> containing just enough #includes to be self-contained (so if there's a
> declaration of something taking a u32, there's no way around having it
> include types.h (or wherever that's defined).

While I like the idea, I think we may do it in a next iteration.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ