[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <831EE4E5E37DCC428EB295A351E6624952397CEA@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 03:07:15 +0000
From: "Li, Philip" <philip.li@...el.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"Chen, Rong A" <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
CC: Roman Sudarikov <roman.sudarikov@...ux.intel.com>,
lkp <lkp@...el.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
"Antonov, Alexander" <alexander.antonov@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"lkp@...ts.01.org" <lkp@...ts.01.org>
Subject: RE: [LKP] Re: [perf x86] b77491648e: will-it-scale.per_process_ops
-2.1% regression
> Subject: [LKP] Re: [perf x86] b77491648e: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -2.1%
> regression
>
> kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com> writes:
>
> > Greeting,
> >
> > FYI, we noticed a -2.1% regression of will-it-scale.per_process_ops due to
> commit:
> >
> >
> > commit: b77491648e6eb2f26b6edf5eaea859adc17f4dcc ("perf x86: Infrastructure
> for exposing an Uncore unit to PMON mapping")
> > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/roman-sudarikov-linux-intel-com/perf-
> x86-Exposing-IO-stack-to-IO-PMON-mapping-through-sysfs/20200118-075508
>
> Seems to be spurious bisect. I don't think that commit could change
> anything performance related.
Hi Andi, we will look into this as early as possible, we also receive another input from
Pater Z that he got false positive of will-it-scale.per_process_ops performance
regression. We will investigate them.
>
> -Andi
> _______________________________________________
> LKP mailing list -- lkp@...ts.01.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to lkp-leave@...ts.01.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists